this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2024
445 points (98.1% liked)

Linux

48356 readers
696 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by AlpΓ‘r-Etele MΓ©der, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Apparently I installed that thing in 2006 and I last updated it in 2016, then I quit updating it for some reason that I totally forgot. Probably laziness...

It's been running for quite some time and we kind of forgot about it in the closet, until the SSH tunnel we use to get our mail outside our home stopped working because modern openssh clients refuse to use the antiquated key cipher I setup client machines with way back when any longer.

I just generated new keys with a more modern cipher that it understands (ecdsa-sha2-nistp256) and left it running. Because why not πŸ™‚

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] n2burns@lemmy.ca 140 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Because why not πŸ™‚

Because security.

[–] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 34 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (8 children)

It's behind a firewall. The only thing exposed to the outside is port 22 - and only pubkey login too.

And gee dude... It's been running for 18 years without being pwned πŸ™‚

[–] imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee 100 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 12 points 2 months ago

For that matter, it hasn't been ransomwared. There are so many ways to hide a compromise.

[–] ivn@jlai.lu 77 points 2 months ago (1 children)

without being pwned

How do you know?

[–] Hupf@feddit.org 33 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There's a file called /pwnedornot and it contains "no, you're safe bro"

[–] n2burns@lemmy.ca 64 points 2 months ago

And it's not like it contains any sensitive information. I'm sure all your emails are just friendly correspondence with your pen pal.

[–] schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business 33 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'd still maybe build a modern OpenSSH package.

There's been an awful lot of RCEs in the past two decades and uh, if that's rawdogging the internet, I'm honestly shocked you haven't been hit with any by now.

[–] Sbauer@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Eh, building anything modern on a system that old would be painful I bet.

Maybe you could use https://github.com/openssh/openssh-portable since that’s meant to be portable. I’d certainly would give it a try if I didn’t want to bother trying to upgrade that system. Then again, trying to upgrade it through the releases to a modern Debian might be fun too.

[–] 30p87@feddit.org 24 points 2 months ago

How do you know? Do you constantly monitor running processes, performance and network connections?

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

sorry, but what kind of email server listens only on SSH?

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago

The most secure ones

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 months ago

How do you know? OpenSSH is pretty good but it isn't impenetrable. Especially for almost 10 years.

[–] rhacer@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Did you really only use it when you were home? If you used it outside the firewall then port 25 must have been open also.

I used to run my own server and this was in the early 90s. Then one day, perusing the logs I realized I was not smart enough on the security front to even attempt such a thing. It was quickly shut down and the MX record moved to an outsourced mail provider.

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world -5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Most 'hackers' are just mid tier (mediocre) IT level types who rely on existing exploits floating around in the wild. It'd probably be hard to find any still in circulation for such an old system.

[–] limonfiesta@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

We're not talking about some punch card COBOL machine he jimmy rigged with network access, it's an old Debian Linux box with SSH enabled.

It's not like Metasploit would have a tough time finding unpatched vulnerabilities for it...

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What makes it a even bigger target is the fact that it is a mail server

[–] limonfiesta@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Unless it's for SMTP only, it's probably a back end sever to some other front facing box, or service, that has IP addresses whitelisted for email.

I'm pretty sure I read one of his comments elsewhere talking about tunneling everything over SSH, so I assume that's what he meant, but I could be mistaken.

Regardless, using an EOL distro as an internet facing SSH server that's 8 years behind on SSH updates, is probably a bad idea.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It isn't the "hackers" you should worry about. Its the nation states that take over huge numbers of machines.

[–] DemocratPostingSucks@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If the NSA (GCHQ here in the UK) want my emails they're getting it either way, I'm not able to stop nation states

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I was more referring to foreign countries and cyberwarfare. Like it or not counties have now realized cyberattacks can be very devastating. A compromised server may very well be used for all sorts of purposes that many are probably not ok with.

[–] PlexSheep@infosec.pub 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

As a private person, defending against nation threat actors is impossible. And not only as a private person, but even as a medium sized company.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 months ago

You just need to not be the easy target. You don't need outrun the bear you just need to be ahead of whatever Joe is doing