this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2023
307 points (86.5% liked)

United Kingdom

4105 readers
40 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] allywilson@sopuli.xyz 127 points 1 year ago (4 children)

For a gender that less than 0.5% of the population identifies as (Wiki numbers, 355 people out of 100,000), we sure do argue about this a lot, don't we?

[–] WhaleScenery@lemmy.world 66 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Never underestimate the will of bigots to obsess over other people’s genitalia.

Edit: I said the above to be facetious and poke fun at these wall-eyed transphobic lunatics. I realise that trans / NB issues encompass SO much more than that, and I was being deliberately reductive in order to make a point. I hope that comes through ❤️

[–] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 21 points 1 year ago

I hope that comes through ❤️

Clear as a bell. Anyone shitting on you is as tone-deaf as JK.

[–] K3zi4@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's just one of the culture war angles propagated by the rich to keep everyone angry with each other while they reap up as much of the world's wealth as possible before any of the forthcoming disasters- whether that is climate crisis migration, the next financial crisis, AI unemployment crisis, further war, food and water shortages worldwide, etc...

The writing is on the wall, a majority of people can see it too if you ask them, but unfortunately people can't help but get sucked in anyway. Probably because it's a distraction from facing the uncertain future we all have.

OR, this is just a tinfoil hat getting the better of me. It feels like a logical conclusion, so maybe that's the fallacy I've fallen for.

[–] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

No, you’re right. Between 2009 and 2011, both the left and the right had their popular class movements with Occupy Wall Street and the Tea Party. The risk of both sides coming together to attack the rich was too dangerous. Shortly after that we had Obama and other business and political leaders talking about “systemic racial discrimination.” Boy has that divided us. An incredibly effective tool to convince us idiots that race has ANYTHING to do with our differences. Poor people have far more in common with each other than they do with the rich. The trans issue has been injected to stoke the fires more, and everyone has been quick to jump on board.

You know what? If we’re too stupid to see through this obvious charade, maybe this is what we deserve.

[–] HandBreadedTools@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Holy fuck you are so dense. Bringing up the tea party as a way of class solidarity? You are either lying or ignorant.

Please, learn about the shit you spew if you actually care, but I assume you don't since here you are spewing nonsense.

[–] DaDaDrood@feddit.nl 4 points 1 year ago

Not OP, but I don’t think they mean that the Tea Party was part of class solidarity, but more that it was a movement that was unorchestrated by the powers that be and could, if left unanswered, lead to threatening the status quo, aka super wealthy.

[–] Arrakis@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

This is probably the most hilarious overreaction I've seen in a while.

[–] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don’t know what you mean by “class solidarity,” but it was born in the fires of the 2008/2009 bank bailouts in which millions of ordinary people were wiped out financially while the financial institutions were given trillions of dollars. There was a lot of anger at the perception of crony capitalism and elites. The movement itself was grassroots and clearly feared by the powerful. You might not like the goals of the movement, but their anger was palpable, and at one point, something like 10% of the country identified with the movement. There was no way the rich and powerful could let ordinary citizens form such a powerful voting bloc.

[–] jaywalker@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

The tea party movement wasn't grassroots at that point as it was being funded almost entirely by billionaires and groups like Americans for Prosperity. What you're saying here is almost the exact opposite of reality.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Better that than throwing off the shackles of the oppressor and rising up against the oligarch class.

Those brown lads area after your crumbs! That man wants to be called "they"! Ooh look, Israel/Gaza, pick a side! Look at this jobless woman with her fancy flat screen television! Does eating Wotsits cure cancer? Distract yourselves with yourselves.

[–] Globulart@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Can I interest you in everything, all of the time?

[–] ThePyroPython@feddit.uk 5 points 1 year ago

Apathy's a tragedy and boredom is a crime.

Anything and everything, all of the time.

[–] HerbalGamer@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago
[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Even if they were only 1 in a billion. They still deserve to exist and live their lives how they like if it doesn't negatively affect others.

[–] Someology@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

They do, and they should get on with that, and start ignoring people who don't agree with them, their lifestyle, or use of language. You cannot enforce your own ideas about your identity on anyone else, because they are also entitled to have their own ideas. All a person can do is just live. Celebrity opinions are not law, and should not be paid such attention as if they matter.