Linux

48381 readers

1097 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

nooter692@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

290

TIL Debian releases are named after Toy Story characters (wiki.debian.org)

submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by Charger8232@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml

100 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The codenames for every major Debian release are named after characters from Pixar's Toy Story franchise. Debian's unstable release is fittingly named after Sid, an unstable character from the Toy Story movies.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I love the Linux world's tradition of less serious names, in general.

I hate it. Which came out later, "stretch", "Woody", "Jessie"? It's so annoying to have to look that up.

[–] pmc@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Which came later, Windows XP, ME, or Vista? Sure, you probably have that memorized, but if you didn't it wouldn't be immediately obvious. That's just a problem with using codenames instead of numbers, nothing to do with unserious names. At least Debian releases have reasonable version numbers alongside the codenames, unlike some other operating systems!

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works -4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You've made my point. Code names are a bad idea.

[–] deltapi@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I guess it's a good thing the Debian releases all have version numbers then.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

Take a look in /etc/apt.sources* and tell me what you see.