this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

World News

32348 readers
415 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sndmn@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They share a common enemy, democracy.

[–] brain_in_a_box@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

President for life doesn't sound democratic.

[–] ElChapoDeChapo@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Term limits that silence the will of the people don't sound democratic to me

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Neither does censoring criticism of the government and proxy depictions of it.

Imagine for a split second that the strongest government in the world is constantly attempting to cause the overthrow of your legitimately popular government, despite it being popular and significantly beloved by almost all people there. This external, most powerful government in the world tried to cause unrest in every possible way, including funding all opposition groups and organizations regardless of their violent/genocidal intent (e.g. Falun Gong, Islamic terror groups) and cause unrest on your borders (Pakistan, Afghanistan, Korea).

What do you do? When good faith polling shows that you're popular and fulfilling the needs and desires of your country's working class but a foreign press tries to speak about the terribleness and need for overthrow, do you just let that happen with more money and propoganda than you can possibly provide to support yourself? Or do you censor the BS and report to your population that these images/ideas/orgs are actually subversive and attempting to change the government they legitimately love.

In this hypothetical situation, what do you propose? Allowing the propaganda but claiming it's wrong has failed in many projects, and resulted in massacres once fascism won (Chile, Indonesia). Just trying to set up a wall of no information works for a bit, but info can cross anyways (USSR). Allowing limited access if you search for it but not allowing it's widespread propagation is the method of china. A VPN allows you to see it all, but it can't be spread too widely before it is stopped from being viral.

Do you have a better solution? Because this is how China presents itself and how the Chinese population sees it

[–] brain_in_a_box@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

What's that got to do with China?

[–] sndmn@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Do you not know what the structure of China is?

Serious question, do you? When I criticise the US I do so from a position of knowing how power works between its three branches of government, how the senate works, how local governance works, how elections work, how the courts work. Do you know how China conducts any of these? Do you know how they govern 1.6billion people?

[–] drbluefall@toast.ooo -1 points 1 year ago (6 children)

It's a one-party state with all candidates chosen by the party.

It may wear the skin of a democracy, but it is not a democracy.

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's a one-party state with all candidates chosen by the party.

It may wear the skin of a democracy, but it is not a democracy.

This is the vaguest description ever and it's not even correct with the vague points. There are multiple parties, and given that there are multiple parties the candidates certainly aren't chosen by one party.

How are candidates chosen? Who elects them? When are elections held? What is the structure of the elections?

Do you know any of these things? Serious question. Have you ever investigated and learned this topic thoroughly? You know how the US system works I assume, I bet you vaguely understand some other systems too, like parliamentary ones such as the UK (or not, could be wrong). Have you ever actually investigated the topic or have you just passively repeated vague statements made by other people who are also passively repeating vague statements about it?

If you want me to I can in fact give you a fairly good summary of how the Chinese system actually works. But do you even want to know? Are you actually open to learning?

[–] Tankiedesantski@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Democracy is when you vote between red man and blue man, both of whom have the same policies.

[–] Commiejones@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

And both are funded by the same Bankers, Weapons Makers and Resource Extractors

[–] Tankiedesantski@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Though, in fairness, red man is actively hostile to LGBT people, migrants, and women whereas blue man is content to let LGBT people, migrants, and women suffer via apathetic neglect instead.

Truly a vibrant political system.

[–] MultigrainCerealista@hexbear.net 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Democracy is when The People Decide if trans people should exist but the tax rate policy is written by the rich

[–] Tankiedesantski@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

Weird how democracy didn't stop the genocide of the Native Americans, or the Aboriginal People of Australia, or the First Nations. I guess "true democracy" has just never been tried.

[–] Kuori@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

lmao dog you shoulda just said "i don't know anything about that, why don't you tell me?"

it still would have taken you zero effort and you'd have avoided embarrassing yourself

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

It's a one-party state with all candidates chosen by the party.

I much prefer all those two or three party states where the candidates are chosen by their respective parties on the marching orders of the capitalist class

[–] Giyuu@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago

So you don't know the structure

[–] AntiOutsideAktion@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

According to their respective peoples, China has an infinitely more vibrant and responsive democracy than the United States.

I'd hate to think you'd be so blind to the irony of saying such a thing as 'wearing the skin of democracy' if you were living in the west.

Either way I'd be ashamed to act like you have and speak despite having such ignorance about the Chinese system of democracy.

[–] Gsus4@feddit.nl -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Meh, our democracy isn't even that threatening to China (Taiwan's is, it showcases a viable alternative to the CPC), they just had to leave us to our "contradictions", they'd keep booming and we'd just keep buying their stuff while we eat each other alive, if China is doing this, they gotta be really desperate to turn Europe fascist again.

[–] Tankiedesantski@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

(Taiwan's is, it showcases a viable alternative to the CPC)

Throwing chairs at each other in the Legislative Yuan over who gets to be America's most loyal running dog isn't seen by anyone thing China as a viable alternative to governance.

[–] Gsus4@feddit.nl 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

It's ok, Hu Jintao really didn't mind being dragged off the stage like an idiot in a country where face is everything. China does settle fistfights in private, which does set a good example for the populace, ngl.

PS: https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E9%9D%A2%E5%AD%90:

面子是人際關係中的一种现象,在東方等级观念较强的社会(如中國等)特別受到重視。具体定义不明,基本上意味给社会中每个人的尊重[1][2]。如果不给人面子,即是拆穿別人的面具,可能会引起报复。如果有面子,一般会被认为是社会地位较高,更受人尊敬,然而面子不够大,可能是因为在社会、经济等方面地位低下。“面子”是“社会脸面”,代表着个人在人生历程中由成就和夸耀所获得的名声以及被社会重视的声誉[3]。「厚顏」俗稱「不要臉」。

[–] UnicodeHamSic@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

Did that sound like a thing that wasn't wildly rascist when you wrote it? You can delete your comment. You simply can choose not to be rascist, it doesn't cost you anything.

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

Aside from the racism of the "face culture" narrative, the guy is a dinosaur and notably not an official, just there as a matter of respect and legacy as a former President. We don't really know what happened, but those meetings are long and the dude is probably senile, so he was probably getting helped off the stage by aides at around the time they expected from the outset.

[–] GaveUp@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)