this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2024
369 points (97.2% liked)

Today I Learned

18075 readers
273 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 73 points 3 months ago (2 children)

True. He even admits it in Isaiah:

Isaiah 45:7 - I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the Lord do all these things.

[–] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Calamity or disaster is a better translation. Looking at God as a judge, it’s His right to render a verdict and enact punishment.

Pretty good article on this verse and what it’s actually saying. https://www.str.org/w/does-isaiah-45-7-teach-that-god-created-evil-

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

A judge might have a "right" to punish people for things they didn't know were wrong, but this is a judge who created those people without giving them the capacity to know right from wrong in the first place and then punishing them for doing the wrong thing anyway.

And of course a Christian apologetics website is going to give the kindest possible interpretation to that passage.

I'd also note that it's part of the Jewish half of the Bible, so maybe finding out what Christians think about what it means is the wrong way to go about convincing people of your point. Maybe consult a Rabbi's interpretation instead.

[–] LennethAegis@fedia.io -2 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Can't have light without dark. Can't have good without evil. Otherwise you just have boring stagnation. God likes chaos and excitement, not boring safety.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 31 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Why can't you have light without dark? If you sped up all the molecules in the universe to the point that they were all radiating heat, you would have light without dark.

[–] NielsBohron@lemmy.world 31 points 3 months ago

Plus, admitting that God cannot create light without dark or good without evil means admitting God is not omnipotent.

[–] LennethAegis@fedia.io 24 points 3 months ago

You win this round, science.

[–] ChocoboRocket@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Only if that heat radiation would be evenly distributed - otherwise you would have a gradient which still results in duality of light/dark

There are also places that are relatively empty, which would result in a more typical darkness

Also, speeding everything in existence up to the point of luminance is kind of tricky, what with natural law and all

[–] Ageroth@reddthat.com 4 points 3 months ago

Pretty sure almost all the matter we can interact with does produce blackbody radiation

[–] button_masher@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago

Radiation is vibration which is subject to destructive interference which means there will always be some dark spots, relatively speaking.

Unless God just had a single source with absolutely no barriers or observers. I can see why that God would get bored and invent some drama 😆

[–] BlueMagma@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

How would you know it's light if there was no dark to contrast it ? Light only exist because dark surrounds it, and dark only exists because light surrounds it. One cannot exists without the other.

If I show you a black circle on a white paper you would point at the black and say "this is the thing that is drawn on the paper". If I were to show you a white circle on a black paper, you would point at the white instead with the same statement. If I showed you an all white paper and told you there is a white circle on it, you would tell me I'm an idiot and that there is nothing there. Contrast is why something exists.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] BlueMagma@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I understand you want to counter this statement with physics, and we could have a rich debate about what we know of the universe and how light and it's absence exists in it. But I think you misunderstood what we are talking about.

This statement is about philosophy, light and dark are metaphorical here. We could just as well say "up cannot exists without down", or "day cannot exists without night". The next step to this philosophical thinking is to realise that since one cannot exists without the other, therefore they are the same thing.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

I guess that shows that the real world is not compatible with such philosophies.

[–] radix@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Christians: God is Lawful Good.
God: Actually more like Chaotic Neutral.

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 11 points 3 months ago
[–] callouscomic@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

God likes Nascar? For the crashes.