Linux

48313 readers

1120 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

nooter692@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

220

"In The Beginning Was The Command Line" An essay by Neal Stephenson that talks about proprietary operating systems and FOSS operating systems. Written in 1999. (archive.org)

submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by Quintus@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml

36 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone -3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

Lamina1 is enough to prove Stephenson is kind of full of shit.

It's such a joke it doesn't even have its own Wikipedia entry. It's just a footnote on Stephenson's.

I'm just gonna call it like I sees it:

I put Stephenson in the same camp as Orson Scott Card.

He had a single book with some really brilliant and thoughtful ideas... and that's about it. People need money to stay alive, and can always be swayed by it.

[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

Which of his amazing books is the "single good book" you're referring to?

[–] cfi@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Probably Snow Crash

[–] zod000@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago

Which is kinda silly anyway, and I love Snow Crash, but it wasn't even close to his most interesting book.

[–] fysihcyst@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 months ago

Anathem came to mind for me. Each reply naming a different book is pretty funny.

[–] A7thStone@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Maybe SeveNeveS

[–] dwemthy@lemdro.id 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Speaker for the Dead is my guess

[–] jabjoe@feddit.uk 1 points 3 months ago

That's the sequel to Ender's Game. It is good, but it is Orson Scott Card.

[–] jabjoe@feddit.uk 12 points 3 months ago

That's not fair. Multiple books of his books are award winning. Even if you only like one, the critics rate him. Other writers, rate him.

[–] halm@leminal.space 8 points 3 months ago

Them again, "a single book with some really brilliant and thoughtful ideas" is one book more than most authors, much less internet commenters will ever put out.

[–] araneae@beehaw.org 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Hang on a second. Orson Scott Card is a homophobic motherfuck. What'd NS do that is so bad?

[–] dwemthy@lemdro.id 1 points 3 months ago

He's into NFTs, if there's something else idk about it