this post was submitted on 27 May 2024
595 points (97.6% liked)

politics

19145 readers
2282 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Having the other candidate openly talk about violating the rights of a significant part of the country is not that moment

This is Trump's 3rd election...

Why are Dems still running unpopular candidates like Biden?

If all that matters is beating trump like they've been saying for over a decade, why dont we run a candidate that's popular with voters?

Why run an old conservative just because trump is worse?

You know this isn't the norm right? Do you not remember Bill and Obama's first campaigns?

That's the type of campaign we need, otherwise there's a good chance Biden loses.

You can be mad at it, it you can accept it. But Biden isn't popular due to his words and actions

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Why are Dems still running unpopular candidates like Biden?

Because he's the sitting President and leader of the Democratic party. I don't understand why this simple fact is so hard to understand.

There's only one person who can decide Biden shouldn't be the nominee and that's Biden. See Johnson in '68. Johnson chose to step aside.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Obama was HEAVILY criticized for his, quite frankly excessive, use of drones in assassinations.

And Clinton had a LONG history of controversies even before he ran for office.

Regardless, Biden is the incumbent. Replacing him is the Democrats saying that they have no faith in the president.

Again, there is a lot of reason to discuss how to salvage the Democratic Party. But not really one where the opposition is talking about illegally deporting protesters.

Keep this up and people will assume you are just a dumbass tankie who is regurgitating Russian and CCP talking points.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago

They were young and charismatic...

No one said they were perfect but they were popular with voters.

Biden isn't young, and he's not charismatic. So he's not popular with voters.

Are you forgetting how close 2020 was? Don't be fooled when vote totals go up, they always go up with population. But even to get trump actively out of office, Biden pulled an embarrassing percent of eligible voters.

This election he's less popular, and frankly he didn't really have any room to spare.

You're talking about this like reality matters, not perception.

And next time, at least put your insults at the front, I wouldn't have typed all that if I'd seen it.