this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2023
1804 points (94.1% liked)

Technology

59578 readers
2862 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Youtube let the other shoe drop in their end-stage enshittification this week. Last month, they required you to turn on Youtube History to view the feed of youtube videos recommendations. That seems reasonable, so I did it. But I delete my history every 1 week instead of every 3 months. So they don't get much from my choices. It still did a pretty good job of showing me stuff I was interested in watching.

Then on Oct 1, they threw up a "You're using an Ad Blocker" overlay on videos. I'd use my trusty Overlay Remover plugin to remove the annoying javascript graphic and watch what I wanted. I didn't have to click the X to dismiss the obnoxious page.

Last week, they started placing a timer with the X so you had to wait 5 seconds for the X to appear so you could dismiss blocking graphic.

Today, there was a new graphic. It allowed you to view three videos before you had to turn off your Ad Blocker. I viewed a video 3 times just to see what happens.

Now all I see is this.

Google has out and out made it a violation of their ToS to have an ad blocker to view Youtube. Or you can pay them $$$.

I ban such sites from my systems by replacing their DNS name in my hosts file routed to 127.0.0.1 which means I can't view the site. I have quite a few banned sites now.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Is there a reasom paying them is so bad? I can spit on Reddit because they basically freeloading from user generated content(or stolen content) and strongarm everyone into working for them, but at least Youtube allow their content creator to monetize their content, even though they sometime ban one stuff but not the other(one veritasium video got demonetized due to containing suicide in the story), so paying to remove ads in both youtube and music is kinda a win for me, so i'm not entirely sure why the hostility on this.

[–] 332@feddit.nu 26 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Personally, I was fine with paying for "Premium Lite", which was reasonably priced, removed ads, and gave channels you watched some revenue.

But youtube removed this subscription tier a few weeks ago, leaving only the twice as expensive "Premium". Since I, and I assume most others who subscribed to "Premium Lite", has no use for the other stuff included in the more expensive tier the cost is no longer justified for me. Back to finding increasingly exotic ways of getting around their ads I guess.

[–] BudgetBandit@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

An Apple product and the paid apps AdGuard, Baking Soda and Vinegar.

[–] nephs@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago
[–] uis@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago
[–] Heidur@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I'm still using premium lite. They've startet to give me ads for the full premium, wich wasn't the case some time back. But I just X out that ad and use lite as always

[–] widerporst@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Is there a reasom paying them is so bad? It's Google.

I concede that a part of the money goes to the content creators, but I can't reconcile paying Google with my conscience. IMO, they are the greatest danger to the Internet, pushing on all fronts to make it a corporate hellscape.

I rather use Patreon and/or Nebula to support content creators, even if it is more expensive and less convenient.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've been paying for Premium for quite a long time, it's good value if you use both Music and YouTube.

Or, you could complain on the Internet.

[–] procrastinator@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

but i mean, i don't have any use for youtube music so why am i paying for it

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fair enough, I don't get why paying for just YouTube isn't an option.