this post was submitted on 23 May 2024
121 points (96.9% liked)

rpg

3175 readers
34 users here now

This community is for meaningful discussions of tabletop/pen & paper RPGs

Rules (wip):

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wahming@monyet.cc 6 points 6 months ago (7 children)

There's no revoking the OGL either. That didn't stop them from trying.

[–] HubertManne@kbin.social 11 points 6 months ago (6 children)

the writing of the ogl was a little loose with that which allowed them to try. orc was made to fix that.

[–] wahming@monyet.cc 3 points 6 months ago (5 children)

Source? That was not my understanding of the OGL. It guaranteed a perpetual license to users, and there is no legal precedence for such a revocation. That didn't stop them from trying to bully everybody into submission. What reason is there to think any other license would make a difference? It's not about the chances of them winning, it's about the legal trouble and bills they can cause. I'm not sure why anybody would trust hasbro / wotc after that fuckup, regardless of their promises.

[–] malin@dice.camp 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

@wahming @HubertManne
The ogl and orc use unintelligible language, and have little legal precedent for rulings.

CC licences have neither problem.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)