Asklemmy

43945 readers

522 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

469

Will the world ever stop being anti-intellectual? (discuss.online)

submitted 1 year ago by ThePenitentOne@discuss.online to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

287 comments fedilink hide all child comments

One of the most aggravating things to me in this world has to be the absolutely rampant anti-intellectualism that dominates so many conversations and debates, and its influence just seems to be expanding. Do you think there will ever actually be a time when this ends? I'd hope so once people become more educated and cultural changes eventually happen, but as of now it honestly infuriates me like few things ever have.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Hexadecimalkink@lemmy.ml 30 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Anti-intellectualism is a strategy employed by some rich people that control some mass media outlets to keep people away from being class conscious.

[–] interolivary@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're absolutely fooling yourself if you think anti-intellectualism is a "rich people" thing. If rich people disappeared, anti-intellectualism would still exist

[–] Hexadecimalkink@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's not what my statement posits.

[–] interolivary@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What does your sTaTeMeNt PoSiT exactly?

[–] Hexadecimalkink@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 year ago

Is your first language English? I can help explain but need to know if you didn't understand because of a language barrier or you read it too quickly.

[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I dislike this take. It assumes a conspiracy among a shadowy elite, which is the same tactic often employed by the anti-intellectual crowd. If we simply write off the problem with a hand-wavy solution based on a hunch, we’re no better than those we are discussing.

[–] LongPigFlavor@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I know some hate this term, but class reductionism is a very apt descriptor for their take.

[–] Hexadecimalkink@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I dislike that term. In this context I suppose the intent was to give a simple response to a simple question.

[–] Hexadecimalkink@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago

Some professors have actually done the methodical research to find out this is, in fact, true. There's no shadowy elite there's just an elite that has a policy towards this: https://www.amazon.com/Gatekeeper-Years-Economics-According-Times/dp/1594516820