Linux

48330 readers

549 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

nooter692@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

Which distro do you believe deserves more recognition? (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 year ago by peepo@lemmy.world to c/linux@lemmy.ml

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

For me it's PeppermintOS.

I started my Linux adventure a few years ago, and haven't owned a Windows PC since.

I currently use Arch on my main rig, and I wanted to install Linux on two old laptops that I found laying around in my house

I then remembered the first distro I ever used, which is PeppermintOS, and I was amazed at the latest updates they released.

They even have a mini ISO now to do a net-install with no bloat, with a Debian or Devuan base.

Sadly, I believe the founder passed away a few years ago, which is why I was really happy to see the continuation of this amazing project.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] theshatterstone54@feddit.uk 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I tried it once, and it was hella impressive, but I didn't stick with it, I don't know why. It just seems a little too much for me.

[–] ultra@feddit.ro 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It kinda fucks up your FS (not in a data-loss way, but it gets really messy): it was showing 3.2TB... on a 509gb partition of a 1tb ssd. Heck, I only have 3TB in my whole PC

[–] Digit@lemmy.wtf 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Different tools handle that differently. Takes a little extra eye adjustment to tease out the information from df -h, for example.

[–] ultra@feddit.ro 1 points 6 months ago

that was from baobab... which is supposed to "just work"

[–] backhdlp@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 year ago

reminds me of /proc always being 128TB for no reason