Linux

48323 readers

676 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

nooter692@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

[Noob] Is it worth getting a LTS kernel? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 7 months ago by venturi@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml

20 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I've heard LTS kernels offer more stability, but lack the latest features. How likely is my system to break with the standard kernel?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Do you need those features? If not, go LTS. LTS means you'll have to update the distro less frequently than latest.

If you want those features, go non-LTS, there's no other choice. If you don't want them, go LTS, it's less of a hassle.

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 7 months ago

And "those features" could very well include "able to use recent hardware"

Built a new PC and had to upgrade to a newer kernel to get my video working correctly; without it, was only getting 1 monitor at embarrassingly low resolution