this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2024
276 points (89.7% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35876 readers
1177 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 37 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Alcohols cultural and historical position in society

[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago (2 children)

It's also easier to make than cannabis. Alcohol will ferment in nature, you literally don't have to do anything to make (crappy) alcohol. Good luck banning that, we tried once, went even worse than the war on drugs.

[–] Vent@lemm.ee 22 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Marijuana grows in nature and you just need to dry it out and light it on fire.

[–] Ziggurat@sh.itjust.works 14 points 8 months ago (1 children)

But you need a very specific plant, dry-it, and burn-it. Just let some fruit ripe and you'll get alcohol. The ability to digest alcohol (rather than being poisoned) is one of the evolutionary advantage of some "great apes" including humans. It's pretty great because it give us access to more food. Look how fruits into alcohol (wine, cider and more) is a great way to preserve them for the winter

[–] zout@fedia.io 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Don't bother answering here, the THC crowd is downvoting everyone who says alcohol is easier to make. It feels like reddit to be honest.

[–] whoreticulture@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You can literally just grow a cannabis plant in your house right now. Buy a seed and let it grow. If you wanted to make alcohol it would be much more involved.

[–] berkeleyblue@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

You buy some fruits (or grow them in the garden) and ferment them… how is that more involved than growing a canabis plant and dry it?

[–] zout@fedia.io -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

And hope there's enough THC in there, because pollination basically ruins the THC content.

[–] CuttingBoard@sopuli.xyz 9 points 8 months ago

Fertilization does not kill THC. Nobody wants to buy weed full of seeds. Seeds have weight. It's similar to BBQ rubs. Take out the salt and see what they weigh. Salt is heavy and cheap.

[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world -5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Kinda. IIRC, if it is fertilized it doesn't really work as a drug.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago

Works fine as a drug if fertilized..

To quote afroman:

So roll, roll, roll my joint, pick out the seeds and stems

Feelin' high as hell, flyin' through Palmdale, skatin' on Dayton rims

Back in the day most weed came with seeds. Doesn't really change the THC content, just means you gotta pick them out before hand, hence sinsemilla, which is preferable, because it has denser buds, and no seeds.

[–] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's also easier to make than cannabis.

You are aware that Cannabis is a plant, and therefore naturally occurring, yes? It was literally on the planet for hundreds of millions of years before modern homosapiens.

[–] zout@fedia.io -2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

To make marijuana, you need to dry the flowers of unpollinated female cannabis plants. It takes some effort and time to grow them like this. To make alcohol, you squash a bunch of overripe fruit, put it in a semi closed container and forget about it for a week or two. There are even video's of animals in the wild eating overripe fruit and getting wasted from it. So yeah, it is easier to make.

[–] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I have personally grown, sold, and been around commercial Cannabis cultivation my entire adult life. We are gonna have to agree to disagree on this one.

[–] zout@fedia.io 6 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Fine by me. But please show me a clip of wild animals getting high from THC found in nature to prove your point, here's the drunk animals.

[–] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Not all animals have the same type of endocannabinoid receptors as homosapiens. However, plenty of animals choose to consume Cannabis plants in nature where they are available, and have not been eradicated. I fail to see what any of this has to do with your initial point though. The process of drying Cannabis is not what "activates" THC. That process is called decarboxylation. I'm not aware of any animals that can get stoned simply by eating Cannabis before it has gone through the process of decarboxylation through heating. However, your initial statement was that Cannabis needed to go through some kind of specific process for it to produce THC in the same way that fruit must go through fermentation to produce alcohol. This is simply not the case. The process of selective breeding is what has increased the THC content of Cannabis, but even wild Cannabis plants contain a myriad of different cannabinoid compounds.

[–] zout@fedia.io 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That was not the initial statement. The initial statement is that alcohol is easier to make than marijuana.

[–] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Which still makes no fucking sense considering that you do not "make" Cannabis. It is naturally occurring plant-life. There is an ADDITIONAL chemical process that is necessary to turn fruit into alcohol. While that fermentation process can occur without human intervention, it is still an additional process, which is not fundamentally necessary for Cannabis to be intoxicating...

Last point, and yes it is nitpicky. Marijuana is really a pejorative piece of terminology, and is not taxinomically accurate.

[–] zout@fedia.io 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Ah, you're going for the technically correct. So, how does it work out for you, smoking fresh cannabis flowers? Also, fermenting sugars is not a chemical process, but a biological process (just being nitpicky).

[–] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

The main reason you would not smoke undried Cannabis is because it is hard to ignite. It certainly can be done though. Generally I would suggest using a vaporizer for fresh Cannabis though. The other reason is that the drying process causes the further oxidation of the trichome heads which increases the ratio of CBN to THC leading to a more balanced effect.

fermenting sugars is not a chemical process, but a biological process

If you're going to be pedantic, at least be accurate. It certainly is a chemical process. That process is facilitated by biological organisms, and would therefore more aptly be called a biochemical process I suppose. Anyways, as riveting as this exchange has been, I think I've made my points effectively. Hopefully I have been able to shed some light on some layman's Cannabis science for you. If you have any further questions feel free to ask. Always happy to help educate 👍

[–] zout@fedia.io 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You know what, you're right, it is time to end this discussion. Have a nice weekend and don't smoke too much weed, or drink too much alcohol.

[–] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Ironically I do neither anymore, but thank you. You as well!

[–] whoreticulture@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

The only people using the rotton fruit method in their daily lives are in prison.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Aka, a lot of old money people are really invested in it.

[–] Melkath@fedia.io 3 points 8 months ago

Ya. That. And not prohibition. Aka money people trying to outlaw it and the people saying "you can't control me".

[–] stinerman@midwest.social 3 points 8 months ago

Yes if someone invented it today, it'd be banned. Just like libraries.

[–] vodkasolution@feddit.it 1 points 8 months ago

I was about to reply "tradition" but you got it better