this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
-389 points (10.2% liked)

Lemmy.World Announcements

29084 readers
248 users here now

This Community is intended for posts about the Lemmy.world server by the admins.

Follow us for server news 🐘

Outages πŸ”₯

https://status.lemmy.world

For support with issues at Lemmy.world, go to the Lemmy.world Support community.

Support e-mail

Any support requests are best sent to info@lemmy.world e-mail.

Report contact

Donations πŸ’—

If you would like to make a donation to support the cost of running this platform, please do so at the following donation URLs.

If you can, please use / switch to Ko-Fi, it has the lowest fees for us

Ko-Fi (Donate)

Bunq (Donate)

Open Collective backers and sponsors

Patreon

Join the team

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Earlier, after review, we blocked and removed several communities that were providing assistance to access copyrighted/pirated material, which is currently not allowed per Rule #1 of our Code of Conduct. The communities that were removed due to this decision were:

We took this action to protect lemmy.world, lemmy.world's users, and lemmy.world staff as the material posted in those communities could be problematic for us, because of potential legal issues around copyrighted material and services that provide access to or assistance in obtaining it.

This decision is about liability and does not mean we are otherwise hostile to any of these communities or their users. As the Lemmyverse grows and instances get big, precautions may happen. We will keep monitoring the situation closely, and if in the future we deem it safe, we would gladly reallow these communities.

The discussions that have happened in various threads on Lemmy make it very clear that removing the communites before we announced our intent to remove them is not the level of transparency the community expects, and that as stewards of this community we need to be extremely transparent before we do this again in the future as well as make sure that we get feedback around what the planned changes are, because lemmy.world is yours as much as it is ours.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Surely there is a discussion to be had around what is and isn't allowed, there are plenty of subreddits discussing piracy without dolirect links that are playing within the rules.

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yeah I'm subbed to few piracy comms just because I like to see how that side of things is going. I've never seen anyone post or comment a link to a pirated file. I've never even seen anyone link to a website. It's all been news and discussions and that's it.

Actually, Reddit was far worse with huge ass lists of links to games and sites.

[–] AlmightySnoo@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I’ve never seen anyone post or comment a link to a pirated file. I’ve never even seen anyone link to a website.

You ignored the "assistance in obtaining it" part, because members of !piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com have been doing that. Also:

EDIT: oh boy, shill posts a lie, innocent pirate mob upvotes. I literally post a proof that what he said is completely false, innocent pirate mob downvotes.

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Are you trying to say I'm a shill? Lol wat.
I chimed in with my experience. You chimed in with one example expecting it to be the end all of the discussion.

If you really want to talk about who does what, look at yourself asking for links to alternate apps for online services so you don't have to pay for them. Someone's been asking for assistance in obtaining things alright.

[–] AlmightySnoo@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

my experience

Which is very far from reality. I literally just opened the community and randomly found that thread, I didn't even have to try hard. You tried too hard to make them look good here:

I’ve never seen anyone post or comment a link to a pirated file. I’ve never even seen anyone link to a website. It’s all been news and discussions and that’s it.

Also, maximum cringe here:

look at yourself asking for links to alternate apps

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

And, so what?
Why are you so butthurt? I wasn't even going to respond to your comment because I read it and thought fair enough.

https://lemmy.world/post/3206301
This is asking for the same exact thing that your apparently so upset over.

Chill.

[–] AlmightySnoo@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

butthurt

It does seem to me that you're the one who's butthurt because I called you a shill though? You literally lied, I don't even see why you still reply. Also, very pathetic of you to compare using an alternative front-end with something that's clearly illegal.

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah dude you totally caught me lying. Everything is falling apart now that you've exposed me lol

[–] spiderman@ani.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The above comment says "I’ve never seen anyone post or comment a link to a pirated file."

proceeds to post a screenshot where they just name the site and not pointing any the particular pirated/copyright infringing content.

[–] AlmightySnoo@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I’ve never even seen anyone link to a website

you missed this part, you're all trying too hard here

[–] spiderman@ani.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think some of you have no idea how legal issues will occur. Unless you are linking actual content or the (direct) link to the copyright infringing content, you will not be having any legal issues. That's why big piracy discussion subreddits in reddit ike r/piracy are not taken down yet.

Even YouTube has copyright infringing content. Now will .world get any legal notice for linking that? No. Will .world get a legal notice for having comments or posts having a direct YouTube link to the copyright infringing content? Yes. That's how things work.

Hope you guys understand that instead of slamming every reasonable comment.

Linking this comment by @zikk_transport2@lemmy.world for better understanding

discussions are legal, guides are legal, tips are legal, but actual files (aka "copyrighted content") is illegal. There are no files shared there, links at maximum, but institutions should be after those content-sharing websites, not forums.

[–] Haui@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Especially because discussing copies of your own data also happens in such communities. There must be clear guidelines what can and cannot be discussed. Also, it would have been nice to have those communities selfregulate. For example, giving them 30 days to comply, e.g. removing any content that breaks the law.

Because the fediverse i about democracy. If laws stand in the way of democracy since they have been brought up by governments influenced by global corporations (which are by definition autocratic) then they must be ignored.

So, striking a balance to not get anyone in trouble while not working for IP holders is the way.

[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 1 points 1 year ago

Yes. The thing is there is zero content breaking the law, so they would have looked ridiculous

[–] TheSpookiestUser@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Because the fediverse i about democracy.

Isn't it, like, the opposite? With the main assumption being that you should find an instance that aligns with your interests and values, not find an instance and try to vote for it to become something you like? That is technically "voting with your feet" but instances don't actually need a large population to stay running.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's only about democracy if you make your own instance. Otherwise, you have to follow the rules of wherever you're signed up.

[–] TheSpookiestUser@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If you make your own instance, as a one-man thing, then it's not really democracy at all either. The only way it would be democracy is if you made your own instance and specifically said "all decisions will be made via vote" and you actually had users around to participate in those votes.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Your instance is your vote in the fediverse as a whole.

[–] TheSpookiestUser@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A vote for what, though? What is being decided, and by who?

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You are deciding what content you want to see. If you're on an instance run by someone else, that will never be under your control.

[–] TheSpookiestUser@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's not democracy though. That's my only point here is that isn't related to the concept of democracy at all.

[–] Holyginz@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Reddit has the money for legal defense when companies try to go after redditors. The mods and administration for world are volunteers and don't have th resources to defend themselves. It's unfortunate but this move makes sense as part of the bigger picture.

[–] lwadmin@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Sure. But we're a group of volunteers and we would not like to find out the hard way what is possible and what not. We would think meta discussions about piracy should be allowed as long as there is no linking to actual illegal content.
But is pointing to locations with illegal content legal or not? And having members/admins worldwide it makes it even harder to be sure.

We don't want to find out the hard way and this is a better safe than sorry measure. Again we personally have nothing against the people on these communities or against the communities itself.

[–] xXxBigJeffreyxXx@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

should go ahead and ban image uploading to lemmy.world, as there is likely a ton of illegal, copyright-violating content that hasn't been stress-tested for fair use.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

The music community could be an issue for the same reason, this logic is problematic

[–] CaptainEffort@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Smart, might as well shut down this whole thread then as we’re discussing piracy here too, right?

[–] kratoz29@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I love Piracy!

[–] snake@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Did you ever consider ceding ownership of the instance to an entity with greater legal capabilities?

In the end, it will not make sense to try to keep this instance running if the owners are unable to provide adequate service to its users.

[–] sab@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yikes. Bit trigger happy with the ban hammer there. It's at -40, isn't that filtering enough?

Edit: it was an instance ban initially, this is more reasonable.

[–] Weslee@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Eesh if posting a slightly hurtful comment is enough to get an entire instance ban... I wasn't going to move home instance just because of those communities but the bans is way more of an eye opener.

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

to an entity with greater legal capabilities?

Someone who has the necessary legal capabilities is going to be a corporation. And that's exactly why we left Reddit.

[–] void_wanderer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No. In Germany we have something called gGmbH. It's basically a non-profit Limited. But IANAL, no idea if and how this would be able to protect the admins.

[–] sfantu@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Lololo

That's a corporation imbecile

EVERYONE HAS THEM !

LOLOLOLOLO

Let me tell you a secret ... THE GOVERNMENT is a corporation ... the church... IS A corporation ....

Lolololololo

[–] Tenthrow@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So this nonprofit is going to run the largest Lemmy instance?

[–] void_wanderer@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't see any reason why it couldn't.

[–] Tenthrow@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I guess I don't see any reason why it would.

[–] void_wanderer@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Why wouldn't it work? It's just being a legal entity that rents the servers and hosts the instance, instead of a naturla person.

[–] ladicius@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I support your decision. Want to see the new instances that will pop up now hosted by your critics πŸ˜„

[–] MajorHavoc@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

Yeah. Talk is cheap. Running a server is hard work.