this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2024
398 points (96.1% liked)

Programmer Humor

32561 readers
390 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

I don’t think its mysql specifically, but for some reason the worst systems I have used, all have mysql/mariadb as a database.

It seems shitty applications gravitate to mysql, use it poorly, then bring a bad name to mysql.

But given all my years of experience with it, MSSQL > Posgresql > Mysql > Oracle

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I feel like the popularity of the LAMP stack (or WAMP if you were just starting out your interest in software and hadn't yet moved to Linux) in the 00s and early 10s is to blame here. MySQL ended up being the default choice for people who didn't know much about databases.

Now that I know more than I did at the age of 14 when I first started learning programming... I'll be honest, I'm still likely to choose MySQL just because it's familiar. But at least I know what indices are now, and I try to avoid dependent subqueries :)

To be fair, I feel like I should use Postgresql more, I just haven't actually ever worked on anything that needed the cool data types it has extensions for.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 2 points 8 months ago

Databases need tuning for your workload, and most people just think it’s a big box where you can dump anything you want and it will work. And then when it chokes on a terrible query they blame the DBA.

This makes DBAs very cranky.

[–] vapeloki@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

I was a DBA for over 10 years. Postgresql is superior to mssql in most ways. Especially replication.

But that does not mean that mssql is bad. MySQL is, oracle is.