this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
217 points (96.2% liked)

Games

16822 readers
1213 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Outtatime@sh.itjust.works 11 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Sorry, a game that's been out for years shouldn't be $60. Start discounting these older games like they used to do.

[–] I_Clean_Here@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago (1 children)

TOTK came out not a year ago. This article is specifically about how TOTK was allegedly downloaded 1 million times before it even was released. You did not even read two sentences of this article.

Nintendo filed a civil lawsuit on February 26 against Yuzu software developer Tropic Haze, claiming that the team’s tech let folks illegally pirate 2023’s The Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom over one million times a full week and a half before it even came out.

[–] Outtatime@sh.itjust.works -5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

My comment wasn't about the specifics of the article, rather, more about why people pirate games in the first place. For the most part it's because of the price.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

i don’t care what he linked article is about, let’s talk about what i think is important…

[–] Outtatime@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] some_guy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 months ago

You can’t even spell your username right how the fuck do you expect anyone to take you seriously lol

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 6 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Did Nintendo ever really discount their games?

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

nah, best you'll get is a deal like "buy this $60 game and we'll give you uhh, $10 in credit or smth, idc just buy the game". sometimes physical shops discount their games but that's entirely up to the owners of the shops.

Nintendo's flagship titles are basically immune to sales

[–] T156@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Even the old ones aren't particularly immune. A pokemon gold cartridge sells for only $10 less than a brand new Pokemon game at a fair few of the games stores I've been to.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 3 points 9 months ago

That is more a mix of "collectors" and existential crises. People want to own the games they grew up with (nobody look at my shelf of Armored Core games...) and that went into overdrive when we were all expecting the world to end because of COVID... so expect another massive burst of sales come November.

And then you have the people who decide that, much like with baseball/pokemon cards, their scraped up pokemon yellow cartridge will be their retirement fund because it will be so valuable.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 8 points 9 months ago (3 children)

To my understanding, Nintendo actively opposed doing so.

But when Nintendo was "competing" with Sega/Sony, brick and mortar stores had a LOT more power. EBGames/Gamestop could basically do whatever they wanted because moving the Nintendo shelves to be behind the Sony shelves would lead to noticeable sales changes. So it was a lot more common for Toys R Us to run their own sales to move merchandise.

But in the past twenty years or so, Nintendo have actively shitlisted anyone who puts a discount on their games. Amazon famously got shitlisted at least three or four times which led to a lot of weirdness in terms of what "editions" of a given game was available for purchase.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

All my physical Switch games (which is most of them) I got used at GameStop because they were all about 50-70% cheaper than buying new or through Nintendo's store. Even TOTK which I got maybe 3 months or so after release was only $35 used. Games that were even older were mostly $10-20.

[–] Noodle07@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Funny fact: the game stores here are so greedy you can find used game for more than the online shop price 🤷

[–] Patches@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago

It won't be so fun when Nintendo shuts down the online shop in 2 years after they drop the Switch 2. Because fuck you that's why.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Where is here for you? I wanna make sure to avoid it.

[–] Noodle07@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

France.. It's great besides that haha

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 2 points 9 months ago

And gamestop paid the original buyer of that something like 5 dollars so they could sell it back to you at 7x the price.

Utilizing stores like gamestop can be beneficial to a consumer but the entire business model is built on exploiting children and idiots.

So it was a lot more common for Toys R Us to run their own sales to move merchandise

Ah, I remember that. I used to buy most of my GBA and Sega Gamegear games at Toys R Us, and most games went for $20 or less, and I think I got some deals around $5-10 for older games. This was a long time ago, so I don't recall specifics, but I do remember Toys R Us being the place to go for video games.

[–] TGTX@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Yeah, back in the late 90s, Circuit City exclusively sold PlayStation and didn’t even offer Nintendo products until closer to the GBA / GameCube era.

CompUSA did the same too.

Everyone forgets the old retailers, but one big argument to PlayStation beating the N64 was that the games were cheaper and available in a lot more retailers than Nintendo’s products.

[–] Kiosade@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

They run discounts all the time. So do places like Target. This myth of Nintendo never lowering prices of games is insane.

They don't reduce the retail price, but they do go on sales periodically, but rarely more than 30% or so. Link's Awakening (2019) and Breath of the Wild (2017) still retail for $60. A good sale might bring it down to $40 (probably more like $50), and used on eBay go for $35-45.

For PC games of similar age and initial launch price, you'd probably spend like $10-20. Yes, you can technically get a discount, but it's not going to be that much.