this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
222 points (97.4% liked)

Asklemmy

44150 readers
757 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlihpFlorp@lemm.ee 41 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I feel like that’s one of those things where the conversational use of chemicals and scientific use has drifted apart

There’s plenty of examples but the only one I can think of is evolution, like In every terrible sci-fi movie ever using evolution to describe the individual evil monster gaining some change

Anyways 100% agree with you tho

[–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 33 points 10 months ago (3 children)

The word theory is another one.

[–] ArcaneGadget@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

I find myself thinking this a lot. Someone goes; "and that's my theory about..." And I'm like; that's not a theory, that's a hypothesis...

[–] son_named_bort@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Like how some creationists try to dispell evolution by saying that it's only a theory.

[–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] yoyolll@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Idk if that helps your point as it’s simultaneously one of the most studied and least understood things in physics. Although I doubt a creationist could mount that argument.

[–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 1 points 9 months ago

The point is it's not just a guess with no evidence which is what they think a theory is.

If they came back with that you try and explain that's why it's called a theory and not a fact.

[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

But that's just a theory, a gaaaame theory

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

Matpat is a fascist piece of shit.

[–] exocrinous@lemm.ee 6 points 10 months ago

AI. In the real world, AI is any computer process that can make decisions as if it were smart. Expert systems, genetic algorithms, hell even fuzzy logic. A smart lightbulb is artificially smart. Artificially intelligent.

In movies and bad tech blogs, AI means a sapient machine and that's why LLMs aren't actually AI.