this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2024
743 points (94.4% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2829 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Gretchen Whitmer responds to calls by some Democrats to vote ‘uncommitted’ in Michigan’s primary on Tuesday

Gretchen Whitmer, the Michigan governor, pushed back on calls to not vote for Joe Biden over his handling of the Israel-Gaza conflict, saying on Sunday that could help Trump get re-elected.

“It’s important not to lose sight of the fact that any vote that’s not cast for Joe Biden supports a second Trump term,” she said on Sunday during an interview on CNN’s State of the Union. “A second Trump term would be devastating. Not just on fundamental rights, not just on our democracy here at home, but also when it comes to foreign policy. This was a man who promoted a Muslim ban.”

Whitmer, who is a co-chair of Biden’s 2024 campaign, also said she wasn’t sure what to expect when it came to the protest vote.

Rashida Tlaib, a Democrat who is the only Palestinian-American serving in Congress, urged Democrats last week to vote “uncommitted” in Michigan’s 27 February primary.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ekybio@lemmy.world 37 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Objectively correct take.

You can validly hate Biden for the handling of Gaza. But not voting for him is just helping the Fascists win.

Swallow your pride. Do your duty at the ballot and then make the real changes by organising and protests.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

No. It's not on the voters to show up no matter what. It's on the politicians to be someone we want to vote for. We already did "vote blue no matter who and pressure them for change later." And now we're funding a genocide. That's over. Now it's pressure time.

[–] i_ben_fine@lemmy.one 3 points 9 months ago

Absolutely correct. "Vote blue no matter who" got us here. The idea failed.

[–] Paragone@lemmy.world -3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

More objectively correct take:

Thanks to the political-parties highjacking governing-the-country,

they can commit any crime or abomination, whatsoever, and you only can choose between them, because the rigged-system won't permit anyone to have any alternative to what the incumbent political-parties offer.

There: fixed it for you.

[–] HandBreadedTools@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

You know 3rd parties run all the time right? We even have multiple senators right now that are independents

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Okay, so then, do your duty, vote for biden, then work to support ranked choice voting?

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Why do you think the neoliberals running the DNC will let ranked choice happen?

FPTP is the only reason neoliberals and Republicans can get elected, while they control both parties, we'll never get rid of it.

To get ranked choice, progressives first have to replace neoliberals, and then win so many elections it doesn't matter what Republicans want.

RCC isn't the cure, it's what we do after we win. Because it's not going to happen until after we win.

[–] Cataphract@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

For anyone confused or refuting this in their mind, look up the DNC's history on ranked choice and the efforts they've used to stop it. The only effective legislation passed in a few states was done by citizens with outside state help.

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Any reason it can't be done by referendums brought forward by the voters. Just need so rich Hollywood types to put up money and support.

[–] Cataphract@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago

It's complicated and I could go into details about every nuanced situation for a few hours. A few highlights,

There are 24 states that do not provide for statewide citizen-initiated ballot measures (link)

Alaska for some reason is my favorite example

Ballot Measure 2 supporters spent nearly $7 million and campaigned for a year and a half ahead of the election (outside state support). Brett Huber, campaign manager of the leading vote-no group, said his team “had a short amount of time and a lot less money, and we tried our best” (opponents to RCV). Ballot Measure 2 has received the support of 50.55% of Alaska’s voters (link)

So its slightly possible, with millions of dollars from outside state support, years to campaign, and catching the main political parties unaware of your movements.

[–] Clubbing4198@lemmy.world -5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Zionism can be equated to fascism. Biden has stated multiple times that he is a Zionist. Neo-liberal fascists are already in power and they are destroying the left. you are saying do your duty at the ballot by saying vote this way or you are wasting a vote (that doesn't actually count anyway because the pop vote doesn't decide the presidency). I will do my duty by not partaking in sham elections for a two party state that I don't have any faith in whatsoever to deliver anything they promise. Because they have no obligation to fulfill anything they say they will do to get into office. That in itself is protest so I am doing the real changes, as you say.

[–] Facebones@reddthat.com -1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

They aren't destroying the left, there just has never been a meaningful left in America.

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Sure that's why FDR never won in an absolute landslide.

It's why none of the last successful Democrat presidency runs over the last 2+ decades have been based on progressive reform and no Democrat would run with a slogan like "Change we can believe in" with only one outlier being the most recent election based on a distinct aversion to fascism.

America has never created national parks, new deals for farmers, or held up a man who was against war during the Cold war.

Nah. Left just doesn't exist.

[–] Clubbing4198@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

national parks that still rob native peoples of their land? is that progressive to you? new deals for farmers, on stolen land? don't act like america is anything to be proud of, even the leftest leaning presidents still upheld the empire.

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Better than drilling on it. You can't go back and undo history. It's happened. It's a shit take to just show it was someone else's land. It always is. We are all living in someone else's house and something else's environment, so I'm and so forth.

Yes we can be better in the future and should aim for that but just screaming that it's all crap is really derivative of every history of everything.

[–] Clubbing4198@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Its a shit response to say that everybody has had land stolen. Especially when those peoples are still alive. So if we are to be better, then we need to acknowledge that there is still justice undone. And again these native peoples are still here, they aren't gone. Native Hawaiians are actively being poisoned due to the US military's ignorance and neglect of their own infrastructure. Democrats aren't talking about that are they? Hawaii was illegally annexed but I'm sure Democrats vacation there just as much as Republicans. They are still fighting for rights to their land and anyone in Congress or the White House would say they can go fuck themselves.

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Yes I'm actually fully in agreement that native Hawaiians are being pushed into extinction but that's part of the now that needs to be fixed. Actions have to be taken for the current issues and there may and very usually is history to navigate within because it does matter but you can't just ask for history to change we need to figure out solutions for now.

And yeah rich people of all parties aren't going to be particularly interested and it's obvious our government doesn't work right. Your original point that national parks aren't progressive is bad because even though stolen they are protected wild lands for hundreds of years. The new deal was a huge help to failing farms that are literally needed to feed people. We are facing inequality of massive magnitudes and climate change that is going to cause farming issues of the future, and climate refugees and economic refugees. We have to work with that now, looking at what the future we see from our choices with enough remembrance of the past but not clinging to it.

Unless you just want to be angry.

Edit: also my point is that eventually no matter what someone else will take your land whether they are your progeny or your replacement. It's never your land or your stuff. It's just temporary.

[–] Clubbing4198@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

They aren't progressive. You can't forage on them, even if you are native. Its just for the white bourgois to enjoy. They are not protected for hundreds of years. Trump was able to sell some off to oil and natural gas. Biden didn't reverse it or stop it from continuing. You frame me as a child throwing a tantrum. "Unless you just want to be angry" Fuck off. If you aren't angry, then you aren't actually affected by it. We should be angry.

[–] Clubbing4198@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

As if this isn't happening across the globe. American politics is not the only domain infested with the neolibs

[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee -2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

You'll just be forfeiting your vote. The same reasoning can be heard in any country come election time, but in truth you're only making a gesture and its effects are contained in your mind. If you don't vote, even though all you said is true, this election system is a sham, etc. you're still helping Trump in the short term and the harm he will do to women, foreigners, anybody who's not rich, and the american society at large. Gestures, symbols and statements are good, but not at this price. I live across the world but if I could vote in the american elections, I would, and I'm not even part of any of these endangered demographics. I suppose you aren't either ?

[–] Clubbing4198@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

I am an intersection of multiple demographics you mentioned and if you were any of them, you would know that biden and the democratic party has not done anything meaningful for any of them. Roe could've been codified, but he didn't. biden could've expand the court and add new justices, but he didn't. biden could've already secured a cease fire, but he hasn't. biden spat on the rail workers asking for one week sick pay. said nope, fuck you. he also has done practically nothing about amazons union busting. biden didn't give a shit about east palestine. flint michigan still doesn't have clean water. he could be creating legislation to protect trans kids and adults, but doesn't care. so what exactly is your argument about the oppressed demographics having better lives under democrats?

[–] Clubbing4198@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

And furthermore, it is not just a gesture. Or at least its as much of a gesture as voting. Its effects are demonstrably not just "contained in my mind" because it is having an obvious effect on you and judging by the 16 upvotes on the comment, perhaps I have inspired or emboldened people to be just as critical as I am being. But you will say we are stupid or foolish or whatever you need to say. I say the fool is the one that continues to perform the same behaviour with no results and then tries to convince people to not do anything different. Look how worried they are of losing their power that they have to tell people that if you don't vote for us, its back to the trump. what a lovely threat from the people that supposedly care about us more than trump. i know they don't, i know trump doesn't care. they don't answer to us and you know it.