Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5282 readers

516 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

silence7@slrpnk.net

194

America Is Using Up Its Groundwater Like There’s No Tomorrow (www.nytimes.com)

submitted 1 year ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net

68 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[+] queermunist@lemmy.ml -6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My objective is to hammer home that actions influence thoughts! There's a fundamental material underpinning to all politics that you're ignoring in favor of literal idealism (i.e. the theory that politics springs fully formed from people's minds). You'll get more fence sitters on your side with actions than you will with words, because people need to see results to believe change is possible.

My reason is I'm extremely frustrated by liberals who think we can just debate our problems into submission. It requires blood and sweat.

[–] neanderthal@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

actions influence thoughts!

Take a look at the podcast transcript from earlier. We have to believe in our own agency in order to act. E.g. if I don't think I can safely cross a river, I'm not going to attempt it, even if it is only waste deep.

literal idealism

What idealism is that? I'm more of a pragmatist.

My original point was engaging in doomerism isn't useful for combating the climate situation and all but guarantees the worst case scenario.

My reason is I'm extremely frustrated by liberals who think we can just debate our problems into submission. It requires blood and sweat.

Of course it is going to take some work. We also need debate and noise. For an example of people seeing results, Fox News has been very effective. Social media in particular has been used very effectively to influence behavior.

My objective is to hammer home that actions influence thoughts!

What is your reason for so strongly believing that you are right about this?