this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2024
1341 points (98.6% liked)

memes

10667 readers
2126 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 18 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Televisions are one if the few things that have gotten cheaper and better these last 20 years. Treat yourself and upgrade.

[–] BowtiesAreCool@lemmy.world 26 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Except they turned into trash boxes in the last couple of years. Everything is a smart TV with ad potential and functionality that will eventually be unsupported. I’m holding onto my dumb TVs as long as I can.

[–] Godnroc@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

Yup. Those cheap TV's are being subsidized by advertisements that are built right in. If you don't need the smart functionality, skip connecting it to the Internet. (If you can. Looking at you Roku TV's!)

[–] woodenskewer@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

look up "commercial displays" or "commercial tvs" when the time comes.

[–] capital@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

“Monitor” is another. Not just for PC monitors.

[–] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago

We’ve got a pair of LG C1 OLEDs in the house, and the best thing we did was remove any network access whatsoever. Everything is now handled through Apple TVs (for AirPlay, Handoff etc.), but literally any decent media device or console would be an upgrade on what manufacturers bundle in.

[–] vox@sopuli.xyz 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

well you can just not connect it to the internet and still have some extra features.
also if it's an android tv, it's probably fine (unless you have one with the new google tv dashboard)
these usually don't come with ads or anything except regular google android tracking, and you can just unpin google play movies or whatnot.

[–] pedz@lemmy.ca 10 points 10 months ago (2 children)

But be careful of the "smart" ones. If you have a "dumb" one that is working fine, keep it. I changed mine last year and I don't like the new "smart" one. IDGAF about Netflix and Amazon Prime buttons or apps. And now I'm stuck with a TV that boots. All I want is to use the HDMI input but the TV has to be "on" all the times because it runs android. So if I unplug the TV, it has to boot an entire operating system before it can show you the HDMI input.

I don't use any "smart" feature and I would very much have preferred to buy a "dumb" TV but "smart" ones are actually cheaper now.

Same for my parents. They use OTA with an antenna and their new smart TV has to boot into the tuner mode instead of just... showing TV. Being boomers they are confused as to why a TV boots into a menu where they have to select TV again to use it.

New TVs may be cheap, but it's because of the "smart" "spying" function, and they are so annoying. I really don't like them.

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 5 points 10 months ago

Yeah the bootup kills me. I got lucky that my current tv doesn't do it. But man the last one I had took forever to turn on. It's stupid.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

Can't speak for your TV, but mine takes all of 16 seconds to boot up into the HDMI input from the moment I plug it in, and there's a setting to change the default input when it powers on. I use two HDMI ports so I have it default to the last input, but I have the option to tell it to default to the home screen, a particular HDMI port, the AV ports, or antenna

Not a fan of the remote though. I don't have any of these streaming services, and more importantly I'll be dead and gone before I let this screen connect to the Internet

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Why give up a perfectly usable TV?

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Why get a new pair of glasses when your prescription increases? My old glasses are still perfectly usable.

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Because your old glasses aren't perfectly usable.... Not the best example.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 1 points 10 months ago

Never needed glasses, huh.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I've been in stores which have demonstration 8K TVs.

Very impressive.

I'm still fine with my 720p and 1080p TVs. I've never once felt like I've missed out on something I was watching which I wouldn't have if the resolution was higher and that's really all I care about.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

I think the impressive is likely more to do with other facets than the resolution. Without putting your face up to the glass, you won't be able to discern a difference, the human visual acuity limits just don't get that high at a normal distance of a couple of meters or more.

I'd rather have a 1080P plasma than most cheap 4K LCDs. The demonstrators are likely OLED which mean supremely granular conrol of both color and brightness, like plasma used to be. Even nice LCDs have granular backlighting, sometimes with something like a 1920x1080 array of backlight to be close enough to OLED in terms of brightness control.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 2 points 10 months ago

I have a 4k tv with backlighting that matches the screen. When I take magic mushrooms and watch it I can see god