this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2024
209 points (97.7% liked)

Games

16800 readers
532 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
209
Why is the $180bn games industry shedding thousands of staff? (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 9 months ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works
71 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] misterfenskers@sh.itjust.works 27 points 9 months ago (5 children)

I had a shower thought this morning:

At a certain point in capitalism, a wealthy person can get enough money to live comfortably the rest of your life. If you decide to continue to grow your wealth from there, you're essentially not just making money for yourself, but so others can't have it.

I have a feeling that number is well below a billion, but I'm no economist.

[–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

There was a study from 2010 that said that the happiness already plateaus somewhere around 75k annually. But more recent studies suggest that for some people, more money means more happiness well beyond that, and for some it doesn't. Basically, if you're generall an unhappy person, money doesn't help much. https://penntoday.upenn.edu/news/does-more-money-correlate-greater-happiness-Penn-Princeton-research

But I agree that owning more than 1 billion (or even 100 million) is just useless hoarding, since no one can spend that much money in a lifetime (at least without decadent spending for spending's sake).

[–] themelm@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

But you miss that having the money isn't necessarily the point they have power and control over resources people and machines as well as influence in government

[–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I would argue that all those things are even more likely to not make you happy.

[–] Brocken40@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Unless you already have a tendency towards psychopathic behaviors, the they probably

(not a psychologist)

[–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Also not a psychologist, but attended a four hour lecture on psychopaths recently (out of interest). I don't think happiness as a concept exists for actual psychopaths, because they don't really feel emotions the same way.

[–] xenoclast@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Nearly all social animals would be punished in some way for hoarding resources from the group. Between loss of social status all the way to being killed. Our closest relatives like apes straight up murder individuals that do this.

It's a mental illness. We'll probably find out it was caused by lead or micro plastics if our species survives this time.

For now. I believe the correct call to action involves guillotines. We can dial it back if things get better.

[–] sunbytes@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

It's to keep score.

It's super gross.

Also power.