this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2024
6 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10180 readers
129 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NataliePortland@lemmy.ca 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Right now they are arguing whether article 14 includes the office of Presidency or not but I had to stop listening because I was getting myself worked up about it. Is the presidency an elected office- yes or no? If yes then article 14 includes the president

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah. The reasons they're planning to decide what they're deciding have nothing to do with the legal arguments being made.

[–] rwhitisissle@beehaw.org 2 points 8 months ago

Isn't it great that the only way the supreme court can be recused from a case is if they decide they have a conflict of interest? You know...because the fact that Trump appointed 3 of them and the wife of one of them actively participated in an attempted insurrection don't qualify as "conflict of interest." What a fucked institution the Supreme Court is. Who could have predicted this would happen with a branch of the government defined by "all power and no accountability?"

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 1 points 8 months ago

Thank you for the update.

I started to load it in a tab and listen to it while I was working but quickly realized I don't have the mental fortitude to listen to the many bad-faith arguments that were likely going to be thrown about.