this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2024
192 points (98.0% liked)

Europe

8484 readers
3 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, 🇩🇪 ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kornblumenratte@feddit.de 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

leading members had attended a covert meeting at which a “masterplan” for mass deportations of foreigners and German passport holders was discussed, with a view to the party implementing the plans if it came to power.

Weidel called the exposé “scandalous” and said it had misrepresented her party, which only wanted to use the law to repatriate people who had no right to remain in Germany.

What's the fundamental difference between "mass deportation of foreigners" and "repatriation of people who the AfD denies the right to remain in Germany"?

[–] KISSmyOS@feddit.de 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The AfD and their supporters want to get rid of everyone who "doesn't fit" into Germany according to their views. Legal status and German citizenship don't matter to them at all, nor does it matter to them what happens to the deported afterwards. And everyone knows that's what they mean.
But they can't openly say it because that's unconstitutional. So they use vague language about people "who have no right to be in Germany". That way, their supporters know exactly what type of people they mean, but if an inquiry is started, they can pretend they were only talking about illegal immigrants.