this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2024
182 points (97.9% liked)

Europe

8484 readers
3 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Thank the Supreme Court. Apparently all this, and the impending climate catastrophe are apparently not enough reason to take on some debt.

[โ€“] Blaubarschmann@feddit.de 16 points 10 months ago

The Supreme Court didn't say wr can't spend more money, they just said the practice of shifting things around arbitrarily within the budget was illegal. So the government can still get the money they need, they just have to justify it correctly and use appropriate legal mechanisms. In fact, the same court also ruled that the government has to do more to fight climate change

[โ€“] Syntha@sh.itjust.works 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

The Supreme Court? This a result of the government using the constitution to restrict fiscal policy. They fucked themselves

[โ€“] Nacktmull@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Was that really the whole government, or just FDP/Lindner?

edit: To the one person who downvotes a genuine and innocent question: **** you too!

[โ€“] Syntha@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

All of the current governing parties (plus CDU) are responsible, since they needed a 2/3 majority to pass it. SPD and CDU constituted the government, though. I don't even know if Lindner was politically active in 2009, he certainly wasn't influential, so you can't really blame it on him.

[โ€“] Nacktmull@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

I see. Thank you for your reply.

[โ€“] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 7 points 10 months ago

Raise taxes on the rich.

[โ€“] Don_alForno@feddit.de 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

No, thank the GroKo for this asinine debt ceiling. They were told it would lead to choking necessary investments when they implemented it. Karlsruhe can only decide on the rules as written.