this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2024
3 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

48323 readers
644 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dd56 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

This is not a case of old people. Wayland genuinely lacks features. People of all ages find it trash.

[–] bennieandthez@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Relatively new project lacks features 😱

[–] dd56 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

16 years is not relatively new by any definition

[–] bennieandthez@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 10 months ago

It is relatively new compared to X.

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 0 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It is designed to lack features. It has a purposefully limited scope. Bashing it for it's goal is weird.

[–] dd56 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I believe this is called cope

[–] aniki@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

Nope.

-Wayland

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Replacing something featurful with something minimal is silly. The replacement needs to solve the users problems at least as well as the previous solution did.

Decomposing the solution into smaller simpler parts is fine, but you can't just solve part of the problem and expect the users to be happy about it.

Wayland's biggest issue is that it was born out of developer frustration, rather than solving a user problem. As such, users have little reason to adopt it.

[–] 520@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago

Replacing something featurful with something minimal is silly.

Unless those features just plain don't work well in the 21st century. Looking squarely at X11's network capabilities here, most of which were designed before encrypted remote access became the norm.