this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2024
122 points (97.7% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5282 readers
490 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
122
‘Hope is a discipline’: youth climate case plaintiff on why he’s suing the US government (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 10 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
6 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mynameisjeff@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago (3 children)

German and French youth did that, they won and nothing happened 🤷‍♂️

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 4 points 10 months ago

It is a pretty good argument in debates to be able to say that policticans directly violate the constitution.

[–] moistclump@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

I still think they should try. It starts a conversation.

[–] lefaucet@slrpnk.net 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What was the exact outcome of the cases?

Is it a situation where the carbon emitters just went to the next municipality or was the outcome legally meaningless?

If every jurisdiction had the same outcome would that make an effect?

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

In Germany the outcome was a new law, which gave sectors carbon budgets and made the ministries responsible for them have to come up with a plan, if they fail them. The issue is that the ministry for transport is failing them for a few years now and has just refused to come up with any plans on how to stay in the budget of the transport sector. There are some cases against it, but so far the courts refuse to actually force any real changes. The good part is the media has regular reports of the ministry for transport breaking the constitution, the bad part is that actually doing something about it is very clearly going to end up in a bigger shit storm for the ministry.

[–] lefaucet@slrpnk.net 2 points 10 months ago

Damn. Thanks for the informative reply.