this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2024
201 points (93.5% liked)

Ukraine

8285 readers
580 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

*Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

*Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

*Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human must be flagged NSFW

Server Rules

  1. Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
  2. No racism or other discrimination
  3. No Nazis, QAnon or similar
  4. No porn
  5. No ads or spam
  6. No content against Finnish law

Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

Donate to support Humanitarian Aid


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If you view the comments above you'll see that your quote was from a biography, Musk has always denied this, and since then the author of the biography has said he got it wrong.

Starlink has never operated in Crimea.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works -1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1699917639043404146?s=46&t=bZcrLpl8DTxSpYLBntBfhQ

It never operated in Crimea, but there's a huge difference between "We can't do it even if you ask us." and "We won't do it even if you ask us." In that case it's the second option.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'm sure they technically could, but legally they can't.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

And they would have gotten sued by the government that was providing the weapons used to blow up Russian targets?

Musk got himself involved in the war and got in the way of his country's ally, he should be in jail and his company should have been seized.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Probably not sued, no. The government doesn't need to sue a business to reprimand it for breaking the law.

Musk got himself involved in the war and got in the way of his country's ally, he should be in jail and his company should have been seized.

It's pretty clear you don't even have a basic understanding of how the law works. And you've moved back to "got in the way", as if he actively blocked something specifically to prevent Ukraine's attack.

The service never worked there and he wasn't allowed to turn it on. That's all there is to it, regardless of how angrily you tap on your keyboard.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If I had agreed to their request, then SpaceX would be explicitly complicit in a major act of war and conflict escalation.

Yes, he actively blocked something specifically to prevent Ukraine's attack.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 0 points 10 months ago

The request he referred to was turning it on. The US had already told him not to operate in that area. He didn't block it to prevent the attack, it was already blocked because the US told him he had to.