roscoe

joined 11 months ago
[–] roscoe@startrek.website 5 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I'm very confused, but I have to go into work. Can someone summarize for my lazy ass what the fuck is going on here?

[–] roscoe@startrek.website 7 points 3 weeks ago

No one else wants to bring back anomalocaris so we can get some payback?

[–] roscoe@startrek.website 1 points 3 weeks ago

Yup, that's another one. I think that one is even worse because the new usage makes it a contranym. Dictionaries are starting to include the new usage of that one too. Unless you have a reason to be pretty sure the author/speaker knows the correct definition, it can be difficult to tell.

[–] roscoe@startrek.website 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

It means puzzled and/or confused.

Many authors seem to think it means amused mixed with some confusion or puzzlement or something else like that.

Some dictionaries have started to include definitions along those lines, which is correct to do if that is becoming a common usage. But that makes the word bullshit because it no longer conveys a clear meaning. Unlike some words that gain new meanings through misuse, it's usually not clear which meaning is intended from context. Usually I can easily imagine a character's response to something to be either of these definitions so I often can't understand the author's intention. I often find myself taken out of the story while I try to understand which meaning I should use. Because of this I think the word has become useless and shouldn't be used.

[–] roscoe@startrek.website 7 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (7 children)

Bemused

It's used incorrectly so often that even when I suspect it's being used correctly I can't be sure. At this point its ambiguity makes it a bad word choice.

[–] roscoe@startrek.website 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I vote for this to become official.

[–] roscoe@startrek.website 48 points 1 month ago (10 children)

What's the opposite of eating the onion? I read your comment and scoffed, wondering who could actually believe this. The I saw the "Not" in the comm name.

[–] roscoe@startrek.website 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Absolutely, I shouldn't have used cheap as a synonym for bad, or vice versa, that's my mistake.

There are a lot of very good wines at low price points, especially from underappreciated regions. A little experimentation will result in finding some great value.

The same goes for the whiskey. There are a lot of distilleries out there with great offerings far below the price of the big names everyone recognizes. Especially when you take fads into account. Many bourbons and Japanese whiskeys that used to be good buys are now ridiculously priced.

[–] roscoe@startrek.website 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, but...are you saying you never want some shitty nachos?

[–] roscoe@startrek.website 27 points 1 month ago (7 children)

I can only speak for myself but I've eaten at Michelin star restaurants all over the world and enjoy fine dining whenever I have the time and I love it, but sometimes I just want taco bell.

Alcohol, on the other hand; good Scotch and wine has ruined the cheap stuff for me. I can't drink cheap, or even mediocre, whisky or wine anymore. If it's not very high quality I'd rather just have something like a gin or vodka cocktail.

[–] roscoe@startrek.website 1 points 1 month ago

I had a similar situation travelling in Ireland with a friend who ordered a black and tan.

[–] roscoe@startrek.website 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Vilnius is fucking amazing. I really enjoyed my visit to the three Baltic nations recently. I'm glad I got there before all this started kicking off.

Coincidentally, I hope, several places I've visited in the last 15-20 years have become sketchy to travel to for one reason or another within a year or two after my visit. Maybe I should just stay home for the good of the world.

view more: next ›