qjkxbmwvz

joined 1 year ago
[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Yeah, without being a policy junkie I think a reasonable step would be to have Prop 13 only apply to primary residence


investment real estate would be subject to a "wealth tax," but folks wouldn't get priced out of their primary home due to gentrification.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 4 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Right, that's a huge downside for sure.

Property tax is on the one hand a wealth tax, which sounds like a great idea; but on the other hand, it's a wealth tax that disproportionately affects people with the bulk of their assets tied up in real estate


which often means middle class homeowners.

So while you can certainly look at prop 13 as "good" in that folks don't get priced out of their existing homes, it of course gets used to the advantage of rent seekers, etc.

It's...complicated.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 8 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

California disagrees: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1978_California_Proposition_13

Property tax is assessed when there's a sale, and otherwise changes very slowly. It's a controversial measure.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

But this is a weird thing to lie about


the only reason to implement toner DRM is to get people to buy your cartridges. But if your public statement is, "it's ok to buy off brand cartridges," then...well... that's kinda weird.

Not saying you're wrong, and they could be trying to have their cake and eat it too (court the anti-DRM crowd but also scare people into sticking with their toner). I'm just saying your snarky/sarcastic response seems unwarranted here.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I can only remember this because I initially didn't learn about xargs


so any time I need to loop over something I tend to use for var in $(cmd) instead of cmd | xargs. It's more verbose but somewhat more flexible IMHO.

So I run loops a lot on the command line, not just in shell scripts.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Lemmy is not encrypted, my comments are public, your comments are public, we both know that. Anyone with a raspberry pi or an old netbook can scrape them.

If I use an encrypted service and all of a sudden everything that I thought was encrypted was decrypted by the service provider without my consent? That's breaking encryption.

If on the other hand I use an encrypted service and they tell me that they can no longer offer the service, my data will be destroyed after X days, and I need to find another way of storing my encrypted data because of privacy invading government policies? That is not breaking encryption.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 24 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

For many things I completely agree.

That said, we just had our second kid, and neither set of grandparents live locally. That we can video chat with our family


for free, essentially!


is astonishing. And it's not a big deal, not something we plan, just, "hey let's say hi to Gramma and Gramps!"

When I was a kid, videoconferencing was exclusive to seriously high end offices. And when we wanted to make a long distance phone call, we'd sometimes plan it in advance and buy prepaid minutes (this was on a landline, mid 90s maybe). Now my mom can just chat with her friend "across the pond" whenever she wants, from the comfort of her couch, and for zero incremental cost.

I think technology that "feels like tech" is oftentimes a time sink and a waste. But the tech we take for granted? There's some pretty amazing stuff there.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Seriously, it is the lowest-latency and highest-bandwidth communication method we have, when used appropriately.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes, but your wine futures would be worthless, what with his unlimited water-to-wine abilities.

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 3 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Yeah, I think the issue is that the other racist, xenophobic, antivax, generally incompetent policy choices are actually kind of what he campaigned on.

The tarrifs


even though he campaigned on them


are antithetical to his promise of lowering cost of living expenses.

That said, it's the WSJ editorial page


their coverage of the Second Coming of Jesus would be its impact on your 401(k), so this type of coverage (and not e.g., social justice) is their bread and butter.

view more: ‹ prev next ›