India has a Hindu fascist government ethnically cleansing Muslims, Sikhs and other minority groups. It's really not a stretch that they organized the death of a Sikh separatist leader.
posthexbearposting
joined 3 years ago
I'm 6'3, 250lbs, 6% bf and non-binary. Also my xad could beat up your dad
I explained why
saying you're offended by people not assuming you are a man implies it's bad to be a different gender, or trans/nb. Idk why you are so scared of people confirming your gender. You are the biggest ❄ on the planet and i cannot wait until you melt.
I'm not concerned. I'm just calling you out for being a moron and a transphobe. Your time will come lib. 
Ofc the whinging about cis comes out. You're cis by the literal definition of the word. Get over it loser.
How you look doesn't make you a man. You could literally have all those physical traits and be a woman or non-binary.
Why is it rude to confirm how you self identify? Is it that horrible being trans or non-binary that people shouldn't even confirm that you're cis? How do you think trans people feel when someone assumes their gender based on how they look?
shitposting
Wow we got the manliest man man over here! Women love him and he gets all the pussy!
seconding this. i started as not caring. realised im non-binary but still don't really care. pronouns don't really bother me, as for me, how other people view and refer to me doesn't really affect my internal feelings on my gender. obviously this isn't the case for all trans people, some definitely want to be seen and referred to as their self-id gender.
IRL since you are cis and I asume you look masculine there is no need to specify your pronouns.
I disagree with this. It's better not to assume or encourage people to assume pronouns. It's better to use they/them when you're not sure. Most of the time you can learn people's pronouns contextually, by hearing how other people refer to them.
Otherwise, it's better to use they/them unless you have evidence otherwise. Looks isn't evidence. It's not the worst thing to assume once and be wrong, but if you're aiming for inclusivity it's better to not assume
A fascist kills a Sikh campaigning against the fascist cleansing of his people and you think this is Canada eating shit? I'm surprised Canada even cares. Canada's material interests are so non-existent here. I suppose they're just mad about their false sense of sovereignty being violated.