pjhenry1216

joined 1 year ago
[–] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

This post has devolved into shit and filled with a bunch of whiners complaining about the same dumb shit that isn't a goal of this phone. Might as well whine the new iPhone doesn't cost under $400 for as reasonable of a complaint anything on this post is.

[–] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You can get a phone jack adapter for $5 moron.

[–] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Because everyone in the supply chain is being paid a fair wage and not being exploited.

[–] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Based on what? Cost? The whole premise is sustainability and ensuring the people who build it aren't working sweatshop workers like with every other major phone. I say this knowing full well I'm using one of those phones but Fairphone has only recently become available in my country.

So it depends on if you want a bad deal by parting with some extra dollars or it's a bad deal for the workers that are getting exploited so you save a few dollars.

[–] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

You have $5 options.

[–] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It allowed them to increase the IP rating, allows for simplified manufacturing, and easier maintainability and repairability.

How is not including it considered greenwashing (I notice you didn't ask about that, so I assume you know the answer)?

[–] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (10 children)

I despise people repeating comments. How is making the device cheaper, more sustainable, and more reliable greenwashing? I would love anybody who just loves complaining about the headphones jack to explain that. No one else has. I doubt anybody complaining really cares about the environment either. What phone do you currently have?

[–] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Weird. I could have sworn software comes on it too. Your phone doesn't have software?

[–] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

At that point you're getting a very specific phone for a very specific purpose. It's not the rule but the exception. So it doesn't apply as a reason for any other phone. You've argued why the LG has a 3.5mm jack, not why Fairphone should have a 3.5mm jack. I'd also be curious as to how powerfully it can even drive headphones at that point. It must also have a stronger amplifier than most phones too. It'd be meaningless without it. What's the point of high fidelity if it can't drive headphones that can utilize it.

This is all getting away from the purpose of the Fairphone. It's not a dedicated music player. It's not advertising high fidelity music, psrticyij relation to other phones. I don't think anyone is calling that LG phone "green" either.

Congratulations to anyone who can think of an edge case that wouldn't apply to the Fairphone. Might as well mention a tensor chip not being in the Fairphone.

[–] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

Many people have phones without those radios. If they want that feature, it's available to them right now via another device that is better suited to the task.

[–] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

They'll never include it as it needs the headphone jack. Unless they expect a huge market for radio, that is big enough for them to offer a mea culpa and give back head phone jacks, it's never going to happen.

Would people love to get headphone jacks back? I'm sure. But I don't see the market being there to get companies to give in on that.

[–] pjhenry1216@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do these chips have AM radio? Otherwise it's not that useful for emergencies.

view more: next ›