peoplebeproblems

joined 6 months ago

I was referring to everyone compatible with me mating with each other not me ..

BUT coincidentally I do.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 13 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I thought this was me_irl for a moment

Yes I have, but I hope not to.

I'm flattered! I have less hair, no beard, and a lot more muscle.

Unfortunately my ex-wife really fucked with my self-image so I don't actually know how attractive I am or not. Plus I'm like anti-photogenic, I just can't get a good picture.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 57 points 3 days ago (5 children)

I don't get DMs because no one recognizes me.

I literally walked into a bar with 14-15 men and women from my graduating class. I recognized and named each one. Not a single one of them recognized me.

I can blend in with a fed, doctor, magat, retail employee, door sales man.

For a long time the invisibility was painful.

But recently I realize, it can have a lot of power too.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

TIL about the Kinsey scale. It would appear that yeah, I'm definitely a 0 by the description.

But thinking about it, it makes sense. I've heard people say they "always knew they were gay" and "they were born in the wrong body." And it was things that were just natural.

That's the only way I can describe it. I'm attracted to women. I've always known that, and no matter how hard I try, it's impossible to imagine non-women to be sexually (and romantically) attractive.

Like there's just something there that stops it going any further. Like, hell, a woman that visually has a body that can indisputably only be a woman but then talks with a baritone voice it's instant off (there's several comedies where this sort of character is used).

What's cool though is that if I'm that sure about myself, there is no doubt in my mind that other people know what their attractions are, and there is no reason for anyone to doubt a person's (honest) attractions.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 18 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Where's all the people complaining about the lack of people trying to start stuff with feds?

Almost like fighting the way they want to be fought doesn't accomplish Jack and shit.

Well, anything that is made of something that melts below 2500-4500 C for starters.

If your imagination is having a tough time figuring out how to deliver it, I recommend watching some videos out of Ukraine. As far as practicality, I'll refer you to WWII sabotage tricks.

The story of being hit on by a celebrity would be plenty enough for me.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 3 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Not explosives. Too risky, too uncontrolled. Too much debris. Risk of drone leaving too much evidence behind to track. When stamping out cancer: precision when possible. Technology if necessary. Chemotherapy last.

These concentration camps are tumors, caused by an already widespread cancer, that is extremely slow to kill, but very resistant to chemo. The turmors can be excized to lengthen and improve the patient's life by small amounts.

A sandwich bag of aluminum and rust with a magnesium starter will melt through 4 inches of steel.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I'm maybe an idiot. But like, could I start a produce garden, and get like a family to tend to it?

That way I can keep them shelter and fed, and they're free to do other work (probably much better paid) so they could get established on their own (as long as they came back to do the gardening I guess,)

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 100 points 5 days ago (13 children)

So interesting thing here: both groups were aroused at heterosexual and lesbian stimuli.

The homophobic ones responded to the homosexual stimuli.

The guys were bi. Sort of explains why they argue "everyone chooses to be gay or straight." Because they have decided they have to.

This also explains the more-frequent-than-i-enjoy conversation about how "no, there really isn't a celebrity I'd go gay for."

view more: ‹ prev next ›