ooli2

joined 2 months ago
-7
submitted 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) by ooli2@lemm.ee to c/usa@midwest.social
 
[–] ooli2@lemm.ee 13 points 1 week ago

organising strikes like in any democracy would be too much trouble

[–] ooli2@lemm.ee 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What is infuriating, is that some government official website in my country used google captcha

[–] ooli2@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

Unfortunatly the variant get back to true randomly after some time

[–] ooli2@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

good idea, unfortunatly the space between image increase too, and I have to scroll to see all my 4 rows of image

[–] ooli2@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

browser.newtabpage.activity-stream.newtabLayouts.variant

whoua it worked. Setting both to false did the trick

[–] ooli2@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

most real-life villain thinks they are doing good. JK Rowling rhetoric is all about "protecting women". She probably is certain she is some sort of martyr trying to save the world

 

since last update, my image of shortcut, in new tab page, are super tiny.

I though it was to allow to add more row or something, but no. Just tiny images.

Can I change the size of the image without css? Or should I wear glass

FINAL EDIT: seems this monstuosity will be corrected soon : https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/defalut-tab-shortcut-feedback/m-p/86145/highlight/true#M32956

EDIT 4: reported the bug :https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1947401

EDIT: ~~> browser.newtabpage.activity-stream.newtabLayouts.variant a and b to false.~~ Unfortunatly the variant get back to true randomly after some time

EDIT2: you need to opt out of some study it seems : https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/discussions/firefox-134-new-tab/m-p/83021/highlight/true

EDIT3: the opt out of Firefox:study about the new UI doesnt help: the variant still revert to "true" after some time, not even after relaunching the browser, just after some time on its own.. which is pretty scary

[–] ooli2@lemm.ee 0 points 1 week ago

so 3 different agenda, with the same result. Probably it is as coincidental as that

[–] ooli2@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago

astute observation. Zuckerberg with all his new 'masculine energy" stuff, could still fit in your approach: he dont accept his woman side

[–] ooli2@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

yeah may be it's just rich people having a louder voice . But trans existed for a long time, and we never heard so much vitriol against them until a few decade back

[–] ooli2@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

very interesting take. Thanks

[–] ooli2@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I get it. But that smokescreen is achieved with anti-immigrant rhetoric. Throwing Trans in , seems so random

186
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by ooli2@lemm.ee to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
 

elon musk, mark zuckerberg, J.K rowling! Are the names that come to mind.

3 from different background: a African immigrant benefiting from government spending, an American smart young engineer, and a female English successful writer.

They are no politicians, and cant be accuse of trying to gather some vote. Multi-billions amongst them.

I get they lean to the right to protect their cash, with less tax and regulation. I get they are racist because they fear some poor people will take their cash.

But why the hatred for trans people ? It's 1% of the population, they cant do anything, dont threaten anyone. There is no rational or psychological reason

*EDIT: I read all the comments. A lot of interesting explanation: smokescreen/scapegoat, maintaining the male/female power structure, new face of anti-gay , projection / self-hatred , just louder voice ...

I realize, may be, I didn't post a good question. May be it is less about the ultra-rich but more about why that rhetoric work on the general population (else it would not have taken hold as it does). For that I have a 2 cent theory: The raise of the cult of Nature we have since the global warming. The idea, that everything natural is better. The ugly version is only natural male and female are worthy*

 
view more: next β€Ί