olivier

joined 1 year ago
[–] olivier@lemmy.fait.ch 0 points 1 year ago

Does your definition of "stupid thing" applies to tickling itself?

[–] olivier@lemmy.fait.ch 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

why not? (haven't seen any myself, tbh)

[–] olivier@lemmy.fait.ch 8 points 1 year ago

End users (so to speak) usally don't buy full parmesan wheels, anyway ;)

[–] olivier@lemmy.fait.ch 1 points 1 year ago

Great, I guess I just jumped off that ship before it became cool again ;)

Thanks for the insightful update.

[–] olivier@lemmy.fait.ch 1 points 1 year ago

To this guy, yes, though less to this article (that is pretty watered-down) than to the regular rants he posted to friendica/zot/... on that particular subject. Thanks for spotting his interview, though, brings black memories

[–] olivier@lemmy.fait.ch 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

What do you mean by specifications?

This was a few years back, and my memory isn't that great, but from I recall : Diaspora had a rather privileged childhood, in the form of a very successul kickstarter. And they basically were the cool kids back then, and as such they didn't follow any existing protocol (which, at that time, would have been either OStatus or XMPP, basically) and went their own way. Federation at that time wasn't that much of a hype, but still they (rightfully) felt it would be great to document their protocol, and they published (some sort of) specification.

At the same time, Friendica's author (which then went to built several other socialnetworking tools/platforms, as RedMatrix, Huzbilla, Zap, Zot, ...) spent some time trying to federate his tools (can't remember if it was Friendica or RedMatrix) with Diaspora. And was appalled by how unusable the specification was. From what I understood, at least.

[–] olivier@lemmy.fait.ch 8 points 1 year ago (20 children)

It's been there much longer, for one thing. But from what I recall, it's been a mess specs-wise. I do especially remember Friendica/Zot's author despairing over how little they followed their own specifications. I'm not sure they're still relevant today

[–] olivier@lemmy.fait.ch 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well, I've finally found a way using plemmy instead of Lemmy.py. Basically :

from plemmy import LemmyHttp

lemmy = LemmyHttp('https://my.lemmy.instance')

lemmy.login('username','password')

lemmy.edit_community(community_id=XXX,banner="http:/yyy.tld/img.jpg")

 

I'm trying to setup a community without pict-rs (and as such, without being able to host its pictures myself). I've been tinkering a bit with the API (through python clients, essentially), and I've found how to change my users's avatar to an URL, but not a community. On Lemmy.py, for instance, I have an update() method a community object, but it can't seem to modify anything...

Has anyone an idea? Thx