nxdefiant

joined 1 year ago
[–] nxdefiant@startrek.website 8 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I tell people this about wheel of time. It was originally supposed to be a trilogy and then they all saw $$$ and went "JUST KIDDING" on that ending and wrote 11 more books.

[–] nxdefiant@startrek.website 17 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

See, Rothfuss made a Mary Sue. Since the story is being told by the guy the story is about, after the fact, to someone who the narrator has no respect for, Rothfuss has an out: He can let Kvothe keep telling his story and then out it all as complete bullshit, or he can let it be just an embellished truth and then let us learn exactly why Kvothe is essentially in hiding after living such a fantastical life - either way Kvothe gets his punishment / redemption and we learn about what real tragedies have befallen him. This story is deep and good.

What he cannot do is pretend that all that ACTUALLY happened, and that Kvothe went on to kill a king and retired to an easy life as an in keeper. That story would suck hard ass and make everyone's eyes roll out of their heads.

I'm convinced he wrote #2 and is basically waffling over how to turn it into #1, or arguing with his publisher over it, because he knows it's inherently bad.

[–] nxdefiant@startrek.website 1 points 8 months ago

Depends, do you have an unscratchable itch in your Halleryeriperactiam?

[–] nxdefiant@startrek.website 132 points 8 months ago (9 children)

If you've ever interviewed at Google, you know why this is happening. They hire people who are as much like the people they already employ as possible, to the point that employees don't know who they're interviewing or even for what. The person getting hired is pre-screened for all sorts of "desirable traits" before being matched with a team. The people who succeeded there all think the same, and so they all end up having the same ideas, and the number of novel ideas nose dives.

IBM has an internal motto that they really push when you get hired there: "Treasure wild ducks". Beyond the regular buzz word bingo of 'think different ' and 'move fast break things' it means "when someone else has a crazy idea that might just work, fucking listen to them", and it's what's kept them in business for literally a century. I don't think Google has that fundamental non-self-centered DNA. Every product they've ever put out was a result of their intellectual monoculture and the hyper competitive mire of sameness it breeds.

[–] nxdefiant@startrek.website 92 points 8 months ago (3 children)

The P in Prod stands for "It'll be Pfine"

[–] nxdefiant@startrek.website 19 points 8 months ago

10 minutes for a process is essentially infinity

[–] nxdefiant@startrek.website 4 points 8 months ago

I love when: "This is tedious and should take a few hours, so I spent 40 hours designing and fabricating this huge hyper specific jig that I made from the 80 square feet of 'scrap' MDF i had just lying around the shop, and will require at least 16 cubic feet of space to store!"

[–] nxdefiant@startrek.website 67 points 8 months ago (6 children)

THIS is how you protest vote. Bravo Michigan Democrats. I hope they still vote for him in the general, but I'm still glad they're making the DNC sweat.

[–] nxdefiant@startrek.website 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (5 children)

No.

System D was/Is a philosophical debate.

Wayland vs X is a mortal attempting to summit Mt. Everest naked. Everyone is cheering Wayland on, no one believes it'll succeed.

Even the X people are like "Honestly it'd be a relief if you pulled this off, we're so tired, please end us"

[–] nxdefiant@startrek.website 7 points 9 months ago

If he had the capability to put competent people in positions and then let them do their job, then he may have been a successful President instead of a raging nuclear tire fire.

[–] nxdefiant@startrek.website 18 points 9 months ago

Next logical step: put wings on this puppy and call it a TRANE.

[–] nxdefiant@startrek.website 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I changed it because I was actually confused if this was about Jan 6th or about the Georgia case. Either way, they're going to have to argue that what he did isn't a crime because (whatever nonsense reason). There's no way they can argue a president is immune to prosecution for crimes, and for that reason alone, the kkkonservative justices are absolutely going to skirt the actual question and dismiss the case based on "not a crime".

view more: ‹ prev next ›