nsrxn

joined 1 week ago
[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

under communism, there is no exploitation

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago (3 children)

so there is no one "at the top" "exploiting people at the bottom"

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 days ago (35 children)

Whatever “ism” you use, there will always be people at the top who are exploiting people at the bottom.

communism is classless. there is no top or bottom. same with anarchism.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

this hasn't been a conversation for hours

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I thought if you had read it this might be a worthwhile conversation.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago (5 children)

I wanted to see if it was worth continuing this conversation

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago

I'm confident it is propaganda, but not having seen it, I don't know what politics it is pushing.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago (7 children)
[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

not having seen it, I obviously can't tell you what is messages are.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago (4 children)

I have no interest though. do you have a point?

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago (9 children)

have you read Foucault?

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago

if anyone thinks any of these spammed links is proof, please point it out. I'm not clicking every one. this is the most blatant Gish gallops I've seen in months.

view more: ‹ prev next ›