nsrxn

joined 4 months ago
[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

no, they didnt

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It’s YOUR fault no matter how you twist reality.

the only people to blame for Trump's presidency are the people that voted for him and funded him. like Hilary Clinton.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 3 weeks ago

what did contrapoints do?

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 weeks ago

obama ran on the famous deportation mantra si se puedes, and ran out of bombs killing brown people. just because you're concerned about one facet, doesn't make it less fascist

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago

all news is propaganda

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

absurd ideological basis (anarchy supporters)

I am not a community but can you please add me to your list

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago

... bring your own mouse. keep it in your locker. your parents are at work. your siblings are at school. it's nbd.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

lower in calories

not everyone wants that.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

They allowed racist, misogynistic fascism to take firm root, good luck weeding it out now.

was that in the progressive era, when eugenics and fascism were the rage? the usa is fascist, and has been for all of living memory. blue-colored or red-colored isn't less fascism.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 3 weeks ago

they follow their own processes, use their own research, and come to their own conclusions based on what they consider to be the best available evidence.

some of that evidence was a paper which has since expired. if those organizations aren't updating their positions at least as frequently as the AND is, then we cannot believe that their positions are any more valid than the expired AND paper that they relied on

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 3 weeks ago

the expired paper doesn’t matter. It has no relevance

it's the exact paper linked in the initial comment to which I replied.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

And the page about childhood nutrition:

I wasn't reading carefully. I missed this. it doesn't change whether the other paper expired, is the current position of the academy, or whether papers that relied on it should be considered reliable unless they update.

view more: ‹ prev next ›