nalinna

For those wondering about Walgreens:

Walgreens, the nation’s second largest pharmacy chain, did not respond to requests for comment about the availability of Covid shots at its stores. But when a New York Times reporter tried to schedule vaccine appointments in all 50 states, the pharmacy’s website said patients would need a prescription in 16.

Vaccine appointments also appeared unavailable at Walgreens in many states. That may, in part, reflect a supply issue, doctors said. But Walgreens’ note that patients need prescriptions in some states could signal confusion among pharmacists over whom they’re allowed to vaccinate.

The "Read More" button was difficult to find, but the additional content there speaks to your point:

The office has been riven by leadership tumult over the last year. An earlier chief, Hampton Dellinger, was abruptly fired by the Trump administration and initially sued to get his job back before abandoning the court fight.

Trump selected as his replacement Paul Ingrassia, a former right-wing podcast host who has praised criminally charged influencer Andrew Tate as a “extraordinary human being” and promoted the false claim that the 2020 election was rigged. A Senate panel was set to consider his nomination at a hearing last month, but it was pulled from the agenda.

Trump’s trade representative, Jamieson Greer, is serving as acting head of the office.

Even a 110V 15 amp outlet can handle charging that overnight.

This is something I wish more people realized. If it doesn't fully charge you overnight, it'll get you close, and it'll likely be enough for your daily commute. It also generates less heat and thus is better for the long-term health of your battery to trickle charge instead of fast-charging all the time.

Yes, it's total BS.

I'll also share the flip side here, though, from https://electricaleducator.com/for-homeowners/nema-14-50-what-you-need-to-understand/ :

I spoke to Leviton and the general consensus is that the receptacles are not being installed correctly. Additionally, EV chargers draw a load for a longer period of time than a normal appliance. Homeowners and even some electricians are not using the necessary torqueing tools. Terminals that are too loose and, yes, too tight, will fail. Leviton came out with an upgraded version for EV chargers that we will do a deep dive on. If you’re installing an EV Charger, you should probably opt for the more robust Leviton product.

So, it is more dangerous than other appliances, and I've never seen an inspector check tightness. That said, I totally agree that it is unlikely to deter someone from installing one and more likely that people will do a shit job and it'll be done without someone checking it. So, pretty bad either way, honestly.

The only male doctor at my ob/gyn was visibly angry when I told him my experience getting the IUD. He said, "The women in this practice don't give anesthetic and it makes me furious with them." Way to be a decent human in a sea of assholes, dude.

That's kinda my point, though. You have the Google Assistant app for a legitimate reason, and its need to use your microphone is also equally legitimate...the problem comes in when Google says that they don't monitor what you're saying, or worse, they say they can't because your phone processes it all locally. They have this giant loophole that they take advantage of here, in that while they do not keep track of what you say themselves, they embed a third party service that does. While not particularly surprising given it's Google, that's shady as fuck and they shouldn't be able to say they don't monitor just because they let their little bro Alphonso do it on their behalf and they magically get off on a technicality.

Is that to say that it's no longer valid? Or just that it's old news? The list of apps associated with the software is still pretty extensive; Google Assistant even showed up.

https://floridapolitics.com/archives/732387-buddy-dyer-backs-down-on-immigration-enforcement-after-threat-from-james-uthmeier/

Chordia also says his company has a deal with Shazam, which can help it to identify users by analysing audio provided by Alphonso and selling its findings back to the company.

This is a really old article and thus, Alphonso isn't the only game in town anymore. But that's how they get away with it. They can tell you legally that they do not listen to you, and they don't readily disclose that their buddy Alfonso listens instead, and then Alfonso goes back and tells them everything.

Yep. Certainly wouldn't be the first time that something is made to seem altruistic but ultimately gets used in questionably-ethical ways.

Yes. It's utterly useless now (and they aren't being introduced into existing ecosystem to my knowledge). They view it as a proof of concept for more recently extinct species as well as a potential tool for restoring species to ecosystems in the future as extinction events pick up speed.

However, it should be noted that extinction events are a symptom, not the core problem, so I'm not sure exactly where we'd restore extinct species to, since human use of the land is the root cause of most ecosystem collapses, and it's unlikely that they can rebuild populations in the places they died out of (and the land probably won't be yielded back anyway).

Super cool stuff that they did regardless, but can't figure out how it's going to accomplish what they seem to want to accomplish.

Why would someone waste their money on this poll?

It's not even the people; it's their actions. If we could figure out how to regulate its use so its profit-generation capacity doesn't build on itself exponentially at the expense of the fair treatment of others and instead actively proliferate the models that help people, I'm all for it, for the record.