lennier

joined 1 year ago
[–] lennier@kbin.social 5 points 11 months ago

Whereas Argentina, a nation which only exists due to a colonial empire taking adverse possession of (already populated, unlike the Falklands) land, and whose entire claim boils down to "it's kinda near me and I want it, someone who never administered it promised it to me" is definitely morally right and justifies the forced expulsion of the only permanent population an island has ever had.

[–] lennier@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You also lose £2k worth of tax free childcare instantly as soon as you earn £100k, a rare instance of it actually being possible to earn less money by getting a payrise

[–] lennier@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

My local conservative council has done the same. No new services, no bus route or transport, no local shops, just the cheapest way for developers to maximise their profit and shove more cars on the already overfilled roads

They spent the entire time complaining that they were forced to by central government, and their hands were tied. I'm extremely pro new housing but it just makes me sad when they build these soulless empty estates with tiny streets that end up jammed with parked cars (because no transport and driveways take up space that could be used to sell more houses), with naught but maybe a small co-op if the developers were feeling generous.

[–] lennier@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

For such self proclaimed leftwingers they sure love Putin. I guess some people can't let the 80s go

[–] lennier@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

The rail industry was asked nearly 20 years ago what would best increase capacity in our existing infrastructure and this is what they cam up with. Faster, more frequent services on a high speed line that frees up paths on old mainlines for more local services and more rail freight, as these are at capacity right now

Sure, you can argue that it wasn't a perfect plan, but it's what we have. Framing it as "high speed travel to London" is what the press have been doing for 15 years and is disingenuous.

Of course it doesn't matter because even before this latest idiocy the plan had been gutted down enough that a lot of that extra capacity wouldn't have appeared, and we instead have spent billions extra tunnelling under fields near rich people's homes so they wouldn't have to hear trains every now and then

[–] lennier@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago

Some companies main users that they want to protect are customers who consider security to be having one shared password written on the noticeboard in the office. Sadly, sms is just an easier sell to a lot of users, and even getting them to do that can be a nightmare.

As for why proper TOTP isn't supported as well... the cynic in me gives you the answer "the auditor required we implement 2fa, we have implemented sms 2fa, now go implement shiny feature x instead of wasting time" is probably a common corporate response.