Agreed.
I give preference to Iranian civilians because it's a lot harder for them to relocate than it is for Israelis.
kayky
joined 3 days ago
Yeah, this is why I'm not on Iran's side.
I still want them to hurt Israel as much as possible. My heart goes out to the innocent people of Iran.
You, for example, are a citizen who I would not trust to make better decisions than what went into the Bill of Rights.
You're not alone, either. Most people I come across I wouldn't trust to make better decisions.
I'm going to ignore you now. People like you are insufferable and I know you can't resist another insufferable response.
Goodbye, and good luck.
It's fine if you think this, but I don't agree with any of it.
It's good that the constitution is old and remains relevant because it can protect us from the hysteria of the times.
For example, a lot of morons have convinced themselves that the first amendment is a bad thing. I would hate for this 'new document' of yours to be made without protections for freedom of speech.
The issues preventing us from making amendments would still be present trying to create a brand new constitution. I wouldn't trust the current government, or most of its citizens, to make better decisions than what we have in the Bill of Rights.
Sorry for getting rough with you, but we need to stop giving this bullshit a pass.
It's time to admit we were wrong. I've done it and so can you.
It's only crossing the line because they expect me to pay for it.
I don't give 2 shits about what the 'owners' have to 'aim for.'
Yeah, democrats hate him because he's not beholden to the ruling class.
Fuck democrats and republicans.
Good!
Everyone involved in advertising can get real jobs instead of being paid to psychologically manipulate us with fake smiles!
It probably won't pass, but we should still be fighting back.
That would take away a major advantage rich people have over us, so you'd better believe the useful idiots among us will not support it.
Why are people upvoting you when you're wrong?