i think you're confused. lol
jatone
joined 11 months ago
oh no they're a statistical normality! the horror! they should feel free to violate this fact at any point. I dont particularly care.
Cant prove that and attempting via a legal ruling isnt a sound idea repurcussions are too immediate
Making an exception for mozilla is hardly making an exception for the powerful.
As for how i know this, its pretty basic ecosystem analysis and understanding around how monocultures cause massive issues. Basically every attempt at solving these types problems identifies it as an issue. From capitalism, socialism, ecological studies, medical studies, to social dynamics.
Killing the only non google controlled broswer implementation will cause massive harm, massive harm that this legal case is literally about.
If you actually identified a problem and eposed an alternative approach worth discussing this conversation would be playing out differently.
Your parents did you dirty. Lol
The harm done by disallowing it in this case is greater than the damage by allowing it to continue. Pretty simple.
Dont like it? Help find was to make mozilla independent.
Like i said you're simply unaware and unwilling. Not our problem. Those example differences are exactly what give rise to diversity of culture.
And yes its unaware since you cant comprehend how they give arise to cultural differences you cant be aware of how they influence such changes. Again not our problem.
😂 sounds like you're just not aware enough. Take lemmy.worlds stance on advocating violence vs other instances.
Without federation that distinction would not exist. The same types of variances exist for tons of things:
nsfw content.
Ai allowed va ai content banned.
Twitter links banned vs not.
Pro Palestine vs pro genocidal assholes.
Pro luigi vs hail corporate.
The list goes on and on for the variances. Variances that are never allowed to exist on platforms that are not decentralized. See reddit/twitter/facebook.
Hence the statement 'the instance you pick is important'. Because it can dramatically change your experience.
Anyways im done interacting with you. Nothing interesting will be gained on my end from this conversation.
no you're just overall confused and I dont particularly care to enlighten you on the topic given your current lack of cognizance and you have yet to demonstrate any nuanced understanding at all on how dynamic systems work and how bluesky's ecosystem will inevitably crash and burn due to the monoculture it has builtin to its very core via the corporation overseeing it (boom/bust cycle).
There are other larger problems within bluesky's protocol that will prevent it from surviving as well which are intentional to ensure the administrative control for the corporation backing it.
The blocklists have nothing to do with anything besides ensuring a happier user base.
Go read Chaos by james gleick i guess and come back. thats probably the gentlest primer I can suggest.
edit: and then follow that up with reading about anarchist political theories (its related i promise)