hrosts

joined 1 year ago
[–] hrosts@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You know if you've misunderstood my initial comment you can just drop the posturing and say so

[–] hrosts@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

english speaking online world

Who else would we talk about in a Lemmy conversation about people on Lemmy supporting Russia? I've been telling you the Vietnamese don't matter in this context from the very beginning.

[–] hrosts@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (9 children)

I didn't mention Holocaust anywhere you paranoid fuck. Stop deflecting. If you link the double genocide thing once more I will assume you're just here to defend the resettlements. Which kinda proves my point.

Do you have anything to say about the prominent online fascists or fascist Russia apologists coming from the tankie community, some still publicly identifying as tankies?

[–] hrosts@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

I've actually been extremely consistent with my usage of the term throughout this conversation. The people I'm talking to keep using it for everyone under the sun, that's true. From a member of a third-world communist party 50 years ago to themselves to Joseph Stalin. My focus is currently on the online English-speaking community/ies of the last 5-10 years who would fit the term

[–] hrosts@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (9 children)

I don't like being lied about. I assume it's you not understanding either what I wrote or the article. Or you just don't care and I'm just feeding a troll

[–] hrosts@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (11 children)

It's impossible to insult successful communists, as there are none. Unless you lower your bar enough to ignore glaring issues like ethnic cleansing of "unloyal" peoples and recreation of the capitalist mode of production.

I'm not interested in the "no U" back-and-forth. If you want to defend online tankie community producing prominent fascists, then do so without deflecting. If you don't, then stop acting indignant

[–] hrosts@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (11 children)

Thank you. I hope you've already followed or are about to follow my advice

[–] hrosts@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (13 children)

Please learn reading comprehension in regards the article in question. Or to my message. You seem to have trouble understanding at least one of the two

[–] hrosts@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (13 children)

As I said to the person below, learn reading comprehension or fuck off. I don't want to engage in a conversation when I'm repeatedly being gaslit on what I said.

[–] hrosts@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Haz, Maupin, Dore and all their sphere are fascist. One guy literally went through being an "anti-imperialist" tankie to going to Tucker Carlson and talking about how wokeness is destroying West or something. Even in comments here I see tankies gladly buying and spreading Russian bullshit about Ukrainians being Nazis. Or how when I recently mentioned Russia making genocidal policies against trans people, a lot of people from a tankie sub began whataboutisming me about that. The fact that you totally ignored my larger point (tankie community producing fascists), which you apparently know about and "dunk all the time" on. The fact that you tried to deflect from that by bringing up 50-years-old historical anecdotes which are irrelevant to this particular context. It's in the same vein as when Israel tries to deflect from accusation of fascism and apartheid by bringing up antisemitism and Holocaust. Of course, what Israel does is much worse than being a breeding ground for online fascists, but the mechanism of deflection here is similar. Don't try to strawman me on this. No matter which honorable or victimized identity you use, this remains a deflection.

[–] hrosts@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (15 children)

Every time I criticize tankies they:

  1. Lie about what I said
  2. Pretend I'm talking about all communists. If I wanted to do so, I would use the term "communists". But I don't see a reason to attack the group I myself belong to
  3. Try to "no U" with irrelevant insinuations
[–] hrosts@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (15 children)

Please learn reading comprehension

view more: ‹ prev next ›