darkcalling

joined 5 years ago
[–] darkcalling@hexbear.net 7 points 5 days ago

Oh so not satisfied with the rich Epstein circles of mutual blackmail for the western elite that provide him with UA teenagers to SA he is now saying we should legalize the teenagers so the blackmail circles have to provide him with pre-pubescents instead. That is the way I am reading this. That or he has grown very tired of the company he has to be in at those Eyes Wide Shut style events.

[–] darkcalling@hexbear.net 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (11 children)

While the making of lewd content is legal in China, profiting off of it is very heavily criminalized.

That is how it should be. Sexuality for enjoyment not profit. I don't have a problem with this. Now if any of these people were not making money off this and just publishing it for free and got in trouble yes that would be something I'd be against and think it an area of improvement China needs to work on but also an understandable one given how rapidly Chinese society has progressed in just the last half century. I am confident that with time and effort by good comrades inside China that any such problems will in time be rectified. (Also I suppose I do have mixed feelings given the amount of capitalist exploitation China allows to disallow women to make money in this way which is relatively harmless and given they probably don't have great financial means... an imperfect situation all around)

[–] darkcalling@hexbear.net 15 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Good job using a front-end so this racist, imperialist, ignorant, white supremacist doesn't get views. This channel called Hong Kong "Chinese occupied territory". Way to show your whole unserious biased, propagandized, historically illiterate ass. And whats great is the youtube comments are for once lambasting them for it but the most they concede is:

"Correction: I referred to Hong Kong as a “Chinese occupied territory” — fair point, that’s not accurate. Thank you to all of you who have pointed it out. I’ll be more precise in the future."

I'd take anything said in this video with a huge grain of salt.

[–] darkcalling@hexbear.net 82 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Zionist entity sought to kill Khamenei according to a TV interview in the entity Source: Russia Today

Apparently they weren't able to because he went into serious hiding. He didn't contact or accept contact with any of the new people who replaced the assassinated IRGC generals. There was a report a day or so ago about there being problems reaching him for negotiations because he didn't have any comms where he was and it was difficult to get to him so I believe this and this also shows the lengths the entity will go to decapitate its enemies. If he'd been a little less serious about protecting himself and remained in operational command they'd have dropped a bunker buster on his head just like Nasrallah IMO. This also I think is a serious threat in the near future if Bibi gets another indictment dropped on his head or whatever and would likely lead to the war they desperately crave which would force a US intervention. They said they'd do it without US approval too. Iran needs air defense.

[–] darkcalling@hexbear.net 29 points 1 week ago

Locking down the middle east for the coming fight with China I see. China's attempts to woo Saudi Arabia and other US Arab vassals with minor soft power gifts and trinkets and partnerships have failed. Of course they still need to neutralize or overthrow Iran but I suppose they have a few years left to do that.

IF and it is a big IF they succeeded in burying most of their nuclear material with the US strikes and IF Iran's eventual formal ceasefire with the entity includes provisions of not accessing those sites and the zionist right to bomb them in a Lebanon style loss of sovereignty then they may consider that good enough and just go back to preparing a civil war and insurrection quietly in the background.

[–] darkcalling@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago

Yeah too bad they murdered the communists. Almost like we're a threat to their rule and we have to be critical in our support for a place like Iran that despite having a revolution also did the exact kind of dirty work the west would have done (mass killings of communists) to cement their own power.

It's interesting to contrast this to Russia where the successes of the Soviet era are so great they cannot be denied so there is some allowed historical veneration for the communist state and symbols despite the best attempts of the traitorous capitalist leadership there to pry the people away from that and fill their heads with "traditionalist" reactionary nonsense. And part of that legacy is a certain amount of understanding (perverted through reactionary/liberal thinking of course) of imperialism. I expect Russia could end up in the same place in 20 years though. We've already seen this situation in many places where the progressive forces against genuinely backwards and reactionary thinking are co-opted (often from very early on) by western intelligence and interests. Which is why of course the US had its regime media and intelligence spreading that kind of stuff which is something domestic reactionaries don't understand. Or more importantly after the success of naked fascism in Ukraine and the failure of progressive NATO propagandists to bring the global south onboard against Russia they've decided that they'd rather just push the naked reaction angle.

[–] darkcalling@hexbear.net 13 points 1 week ago

He knows deep down this guy is going to keep doing shit like attacking Iran if he's at risk of going down for this corruption stuff. That and the whole doing the very out loud genocide when Trump just believes they can quietly push all Palestinians into Egypt and Syria and so on and take the land.

[–] darkcalling@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I'm honestly not sure how wise it is for China to give Iran top of the line air defense at this point. I think they have structural deficiencies in their government, are deeply compromised by Mossad and generally just unstable. Put those together and if the US really wants to go in on them they'll still knock them down. Add in that the US would want desperately to study Chinese air defenses including just attacking and defending against them for their coming war with China to give them much needed intel and ways to disable, overcome, etc those and the disadvantage it could present to China in that coming war which many seem to think is happening within about 5 years and it becomes a big strategic question mark.

Obviously if they KNEW for a fact that giving Iran these would prevent the zionists and US from overthrowing them and would keep the belt and road open and Iran as a vital link and outpost for Russia/China free of imperialist rule or descent into civil war then it would be a worthy sacrifice to let the US get knowledge on these systems from engaging them and studying them and perhaps even getting close to them with Mossad infiltrators. But not knowing that, knowing how divided Iran is between the hardliners who refuse to compromise on social and domestic issues and the liberals who are such suckers and the inability for them to form any kind of coalition that lets the Iranian people have it both ways (hardline religious foreign policy, progressive reformist domestic policies) there's just so many chances for Iran to crumble that China should think long and hard on this unless they have some truly older (but still much better than s-300) systems they can sell them which won't reveal their cutting edge secrets. Russia I think may be in a better position here to sell them something better than s-300 that still isn't as advanced as the s-500 and doesn't give away any secret sauce if captured or studied up close by a Mossad specialist. I mean they sold s-400 to Turkey which is a NATO state and unless they had round the clock Russian guards on those you know NATO studied them so maybe even s-400 could be sold and they could replace their own remaining s-400 with new production s-500 and s-600 systems to have a win-win.

[–] darkcalling@hexbear.net 13 points 1 week ago

It's just 576 but with some black-boxing to reduce it down to 568 in this case a loss of 4 pixels on both top and bottom. So it's an aspect-ratio thing.

[–] darkcalling@hexbear.net 15 points 1 week ago

Now obviously this would not result in a nuclear weapon, assuming the country is fractured and unstable. But whoever ends up controlling the fordow site now just needs to do a bit of excavation and we are looking at material to make dozens of dirty bombs, potentially falling into the hands of a group as extreme as ISIS. How is burying half a ton of nuclear material and destabilizing the country at all going to lead to safety for the world?

Others gave good reasons but I'll underline most extremist groups are western proxies and even if they made a dirty bomb out of this stuff the damage to the west would be minimal and would be a welcomed excuse for an even more intrusive police state and powers for the nat-sec state as well as control of people and rollbacks of limited freedoms.

Besides that though, the west couldn't invade and hold Iran. But in your hypothetical scenario where it devolves into civil war, they could do one of two things IF somehow they decided such a buried stockpile was a problem. They could 1) hang back and sponsor various groups, maneuver pliant leaders into place for the various factions so no matter who comes out on top controlling that part of Iran they'll have access to move in machinery to excavate and remove it. 2) Just monitor the site and air strike anyone who tries to move in heavy equipment to excavate. They could also heavily mine it, potentially from the air or via special forces or proxies thus acting as a further deterrent.

For the west controlling Iran or at least removing it as an anti-imperialist power is worth an awful lot of risk, far more than would be incurred by such a scenario you outline. Most likely if they did overthrow Iran and a Syria situation developed, one of the resulting factions would agree to sell access to the material and/or the ability to remove it in exchange for things like food aid, weapons, aid, etc.

[–] darkcalling@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago

DPRK. They should get them from the DPRK. Russia has a defense pact with the DPRK who has been sending them tons of shells for their war. The DPRK should be able to purchase s-400 systems at least and re-ship them to Iran if Russia doesn't raise a big stink about it.

s-400 are already sold to various countries. Russia already has deployed s-500 systems themselves against Ukraine and s-600 has been developed and is being fine-tuned. So it's not top of the line and no defense secrets are leaked most likely.

Their number two goal needs to be rooting out all the mossad spies and traitors embedded throughout the country, confiscating all of their stashed weaponry and explosives and setting up networks of checkpoints to inspect trucks.

I have a doubt this will ever be possible to a meaningful degree. They have a contradiction, a very disagreeable one between hardline religious fundamentalists that most ethnic-religious minorities and a huge number of Shia dislike as too conservative, reactionary, and repressive and the liberal reformers whose domestic policy reforms of maybe allow women to show some hair and don't sick the religious morality police on young people dancing to music are very popular BUT who are naive and gullible towards the west and keep getting owned in foreign policy decisions. The liberals get in power and disgruntled hardliners may leak to make them look weak to get back their religious fundamentalist power over their people. Hardliners in power = disgruntled liberals, young people, minorities, etc. Besides that they killed communists, atheists are blackmailable because those are illegal, gay people are blackmailable, etc.

[–] darkcalling@hexbear.net 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Reminder John Oliver in 1000% onboard with NATO imperialism. Always toes the NATO line, was a huge booster of the Hong Kong attempted color revolution, spews Zenz lies on China, etc, etc. AND is married to a Republican party operative (I don't think it's just for hate-sex).

John Oliver is best seen as CIA. Most media are but him especially because he's very savvy about it and appears progressive on the surface compared to a lot of the "journalist" ghouls.

view more: ‹ prev next ›