daddycool

I'm not saying windows file manager is perfect and there isn't better alternatives. But for my work flow, I haven't found any linux file manager that fits the bill.

What file manager are you using, and what features does it have that makes it the right fit for you?

Not Right click to copy or move. Right-click-drag-and-drop. In windows, when you left-click on a file and drag-and-drop, the default action applys, which is move if it's to the same drive. Or copy if it's to a different drive. Right-click-drag-and-drop gives you the option to copy, move or extract to the drop location.

You can open a local network share, right click and add it to the left panel. It will then be available anytime you want to work with it.

Will it be available after a reboot? Because I haven't been able to do that without adding it to fstab or using extra software, like gigolo.

Showing disk size and usage is very native in windows. Can you get something simular with Dolphin?

I guess we have very different work flows. All the things you mention are things I have no use for and I absolutely despise split view. :)

What I miss the most is a quick overview of all my drives and mounted network drives, showing disk size and usage. I also miss to be able to right-click drag and drop and then choose if I want to copy or move. Network management! Being able add a network drive with a few clicks and mount it permanently if needed.

Windows File Manager is superior to any linux file manager I've tried. I have tried switching to Linux many times and it's really great, except the damn file managers, which always ends with me switching back to Windows. I just ended my last run with Linux Mint as my daily driver for 3 months. I really enjoyed it and had it configured just the way I wanted. But the file manager(s) just isn't mature enough, so I caved in, again, and moved back to Windows. Oh well, maybe next time will be the one.

In my experience, the more complex a system is, the more auto updates can mess things up and make troubleshooting a nightmare. I'm not saying auto updates can't be a good solution in some cases, but in general I think it's a liability. Maybe I'm just at the point where I want my setup to work without the risk of it breaking unexpectedly and having to tinker with it when I'm not in the mood. :)

I just like it when things break on scheduled maintenance and I have time to fix it or the possibility to roll back with minimal data loss, instead of an auto update forcing me spend a week night fixing it or running a broken system till I have the time.

You can start by using any old PC you have laying around and install Proxmox on it. Proxmox is a free hypervisor that allows you to make virtual machines and containers which makes it easy to setup and administrate servers/services. This will give you a good foundation to start playing around and give you an idea of your resource requirements.

I know you're half joking. But nevertheless, I'm not missing this opportunity to share a little selfhosting wisdom.

Never use auto update. Always schedule to do it manually.

Virtualize as many services as possible and take a snapshot or backup before updating.

And last, documentation, documentation, documentation!

Happy selfhosting sunday.