It means they've edited their post.
edit: check it out
czech
joined 6 months ago
Why/ how? There is an application process and disqualifying criteria for a security clearance. The suggestion is that if you can't pass that process you should not be let in on any confidential information.
No it was the opposite. Information laid out in his dossier continues to prove true over time as more details are released to the public. Not sure that anything has been shown to be false.
Most criticism you find is heavy on colorful language like "'fake news" and "common sense" but lacks any disproving evidence.
You want evidence?? Are you some kind of antisemite?? /s
Yea, it looks like the win rate for consumers in arbitration is less than 1%. I'm not sure what consumers win rate is in court but it must be better than that.
A law firm was trying to extort Valve with 75k arbitration claims which would cost $3k per claim ($225mm total). As an alternative they offered to settle for $2.9k per claimant.
In the 5 years since the binding arbitration was introduced valve has had only 3 arbitration cases and won all three.
Summarized from the article.
What point do you think you are making? You may need to reread the comment chain.
Policies based on their feelings instead of facts.
No sources, eh? Let me help: At least 12 civilians were killed and 2800 people injured by pager bombs. Hezbollah reported 11 members died that day.
Can you explain why you are making up stats with no source?
The exchanges get hacked. Passwords are encrypted but not contact info and current balances are not. American exchanges are forced to collect accurate KYC info for every customer.
You wrote that fewer than .1% of casualties from the detonations were not hezbollah. When asked for a source you wrote: hezbollah. When pressed for a source you've now countered: "why would hezbollah report that?".
We don't know; it's your premise. Where did you get that stat?
view more: next ›
It's an asterisk if you're using the Sync app.
edit: just realized where this was posted. Disregard.