bsit
For someone harping about science, you certainly fall for logical fallacies a lot. You keep pointing at the extracted brain, textbook appeal to the stone.
You are pointing to contents of consciousness to try to prove matter comes prior.
Maybe take the hint that you don't understand the argument (and aren't willing to try) and thus aren't really equipped for this conversation.
Op made a question I answered. I however did not ask anyone's opinion.
Because all your proof hinges on matter being real and prior.
regardless of who is percieving it.
And since we require perception to say anything about matter, what does that say about which comes first, matter or consciousness?
Consciousness is a material, measurable process
Again, prove it. It is YOUR system of thought which requires that every claim must be backed with objective proof. Where is the objective proof of matter? All the rest you're saying hingest upon that being a fact. But if you can't prove it as a fact, all you have is an unverified belief that you insist everyone else should have. Which, again, makes you exactly the same as any other oppressor. In your own system of thought. And before you parade some scientists in front of me, ask yourself if you can know that they know what they are talking about, or do you just believe them because they share the same core belief system as you?
Tell me you don't know shit about spirituality without telling me you don't know shit about spirituality.
I said Zen Buddhism is a start. Not the end.
Wow. You really actually believe that? You actually equate non-dual ideology which necessarily posits a non-hierarchial ultimate reality without absolute good and evil with the bullshit of theistic religions?
Damn I have seen the memes about Marxists thinking they're way smarter than they are but I thought they were exaggerating.