Zero22xx

Ah yes, Fox News. The company that is simultaneously 'news' or 'entertainment', depending on which description serves them better at the time. These are perfect representatives for the era where billionaires are supposedly 'anti-establishment' and book burners that police other people's identities and force their religion onto others are supposedly all for free speech and freedom of expression.

I just don't know anymore. How do you deal with people who will point at a fly and tell you that it's a bird, while sincerely believing it?

Nah lol, not accusing you of anything. I just thought I'd go and take a look and see if I'd been duped by a photoshopped post but there it is, right at the top. Just below his description of "Professional Neckbeard" and pinned address where all the marks that support him can send him free stuff.

It's literally the first unpinned post on his Twitter profile.

That's one game that I never got into the hype train with and still haven't got around to trying, even though it looks like it's right up my alley. So I might be mistaken but wasn't Minecraft originally an indie effort? I don't like it but I can understand and appreciate giving indie devs support while they're still working on things a lot more than paying the mega corporation for the privilege of being a beta tester.

NOW only it's finished? When did it become normal for these companies to release half finished trash and use their paying customers as beta testers?

They have a browser but from what I gather, it's just Chrome / Firefox fork no. 35,683 with a custom skin and a few add-ons pre-installed.

Here's the most recent take of his that I've seen:

But he's definitely a repeat offender in these circles.

As opposed to signalling that you have none.

I feel like in this case, it's more than that. They've weaponized social media and successfully used that weapon within their own borders and now they're targeting somewhere else. They want to freely push right wing ideologies and make right wing politicians look good everywhere. Says a lot that in order to achieve that, they need to do things like remove fact checking. But it's been proven now that 'alternate facts' are very effective at convincing masses of people that you're a free speech warrior while burning books in their faces, or that you care about the kids while campaigning for child marriage and child labour, just for a couple of examples.

It's convinced working class people that union busting, eternally greedy, multi-billionaires are their 'anti-establishment' heroes. And it's convinced whiny, insecure, porn addicted men that they're all 'alphas', every one of them.

We're entering an era where freedom=slavery and it didn't even require any master plan or deception. All it relied on was the fact that people are inherently shitty and only see and hear what they want to see and hear. And it worked. The people they worship or openly slimeballs and garbage human beings for us all to see with our own eyes. But it worked.

One thing I found about Bluesky is that the 'Discover' feed is actually very trainable. It's easy to fill it up with politics, or art, or anything that you've been liking, commenting on and following. Mine started with mostly art and interesting people, then after one too many socio-political hot takes and follows of politically charged accounts, it went very political. So I made the effort to 'like' and follow more art and interesting content again and fixed it.

Personally, I enjoyed that feed while I was there. And wherever I saw people complaining about how awful it is, I just thought "it's a reflection of what you've been liking and following, buddy.."

Asmongold is one of these 'anti-woke' YouTubers. Spends a fair amount of time complaining about women not looking pretty enough for his standards from what I've seen, while he himself looks like a fucking rat, with a bedroom that looks like a rat's nest. I hate downing people's looks and I too, have been a depressed mess with a terrifying bedroom before. But also, people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.

I don't actually follow any of these YouTubers and to be honest the only time I ever use YouTube is when I'm in the mood for some music videos but I've seen this asshat come up over and over in feminist spaces and places where people make fun of the anti-woke grifters and the idiot marks that adore them.

I think that when I successfully appealed before, I must've just caught someone in a good mood. Because to be honest the ban that I successfully appealed was for a much spicier comment than the ban that I was now unsuccessful at appealing. So the impression I get is that it just depends on if the person seeing your appeal is an asshole or not.