XiaCobolt

They're like small minority of Christian proto anarchists (no priests no churches, occaisonal communes/intentional communities) who are extreme pacifists, but understand how imperialism, social murder and slavery is violence, constantly acting against it by non violent but radical means.

A bunch fled the UK to the USA to avoid religious persecution and them immediately got started to get themselves lynched for helping slaves escape and working with first Nations people.

That said Richard Nixon's parents were Quakers and he was ostensibly one at some point, but he sort of drifted out of it in college before ever getting disowned (quaker excommunication). But he kept the ascetic aesthetic (Quakers don't drink or smoke, wear fancy clothes etc)

I get what you mean but Quakers have been persecuted for pretty much always being on right side of history their whole existence.

Hamas is working with over a dozen groups on this, many of which aren't even Muslim

They've even got the Maoists and The Marxist-Leninists to work together!

Post hibernation bears are very skinny and bedraggled, seeing one walking on its hind legs as bears sometimes do, you’d think Bigfoot.

What is to be done?

I think it varied quite a lot depending on the location and the time. We're talking really hard to comprehend lengths of pre-historic time. Like 300,000 years of what we consider a modern human.

And the differences between hunting and gathering, and agriculture as @xj9@hexbear.net says are not as clear cut. Many "Hunter-Gatherer" societies might be moving between semi-permanent seasonal camps (sometimes leaving behind structures and dwellings) where they had planted different crops along the routes and at the places, so they could change with the climate and animal migration

Other permanent "agricultural" settlements, might have been permanent communities with crops growing, livestock etc, but also significant portions of their population going on hunting trips that might take weeks or pasturing livestock in different regions. And almost certainly some amount of foraging local areas. We know even medieval peasants still did that.

At any rates both might have had periods of peace and abundance, versus scarcity and extreme violence. There's probably some hunter-gatherers whose lives were like the garden of Eden, others who it was like The Road. Likewise there's probably farming communites who were like "we've cracked the code free food forever" and others a constant life of paranoia peering over your hill fort's walls incase a neighboring tribes is going to attack, loot your granary and kill you.

I mean 67 out of the 82 he landed with were killed within 3 days. That plays havoc with the chain of command. Che was only meant to be the doctor for the party and had to step up.

Regardless you're also forgetting Camilo Cienfuegos who was the official second in command of Fidel's faction. His politics were pretty opaque, presumably some sort of leftist but how radical unclear. He died in a plane crash towards the end of the revolution.

Definitely Fidel was kind of a Maoist in the streets (how he fought a protracted peoples war from the countryside through a dialectical relationship with the peasantry's needs) and a social democrat in the sheets (basically just wanted self determination for Cuba as a liberal democracy with welfare programs).

My 18th century ancestor having challenged someone to a duel at 25

*thinking about a second *

Look I thought it was weird when she said she was Jesus Christ's "little sister" but I liked it when she abolished foot binding.