The best way to get a good answer is probably to ask the man on anything cuneiform, Dr. Irving Finkel.
Treczoks
They do this for the upteemth time now. And it has always be cashiered by the courts lateron.
Data simply is not safe in the US.
I just wanted to point out that while it has the same label, it does not always contain the same content.
And the reasoning? As always Terrorists, pedophile, criminals, etc. Guess what: If those guys have not learned yet to make a big detour around official chat apps, they deserve getting caught. My bet is, those people already have their own secured means of communication. Maybe they have their own encrypted app, or they have a forum somewhere in the Darknet, whatever. But the chance that this new law will catch anything worthwhile is practically nil.
You don't have them yet?
So there is no difference for you between e.g. the King James Bible, the NIV Bible, or the English Bible from 1631?
Trump is easy to understand:
Trump opens mouth -> Trump lies.
"the", "a", "and"?
A bank tried to sell me a pension fund contract. Luckily, I know my math and found out that it was so bad that I'd call it a scam.
If he actually was an "Upstanding Businessman", they actually might. Need more reasons why they don't?
OK, now I get your point. Yes, those "ten commandments" would be funny to see in the classrooms. It might even teach some of the hardcore Christians and Bible thumpers something new...