(For anyone here who does programming, the analogy I'm probably poorly trying to make is to Big O notation)
A small o notation would work somewhat better here, as big O just tells us about final boundedness of a function given a topological filter, and also doesn't tell us how the function behaves compared to previous 'n's.
With small o notation, you could order the tiers starting from the wealthiest/most influential/etc. This way, you could go for something like 'the way violence against people of tier n is considered/respected/recognised (on some relevant scale) is o(n) (with the topological filter n->inf'. o(n) given some topological filter F is a set of functions that can be represented as n multiplied by some other function that has the limit of 0 given the topological filter F, basically. The expression 'f(n) = o(n) [given topological filter F]' can be read as 'f is infinitely small relative to n [given topological filter F]'.
That would mean that there would not be higher profit margins, however, and there also needs to be an incentive to increase workers' wages/salaries (at a rate that would outpace inflation, to boot, if the aim is to improve workers' standards of living instead of to increase the GDP and similar statistics).
Furthermore, what reason would capitalists have to invest in the 'real' economy instead of just making bank deposits?
It would be better and easier to just return to planned economy.